Re: Let's see your PEDAL BOARD!
Posted: Thu May 16, 2013 3:49 am
that is a sick rig 
tarpitcarnivore wrote:I’m so anxious to build a board (or buy, but I’m pretty intent on building one…) but I’m not even finished buying what I want yet. Trying to get a phaser, a midi controller for the Space, a volume pedal, and expression or two. I’m forgetting a couple other things.
one thing i am still trying to figure out is which patch cables to go with. george l's or lavas? anyone have any opinions? ..

That EGC!!!!!tarpitcarnivore wrote:I’m so anxious to build a board (or buy, but I’m pretty intent on building one…) but I’m not even finished buying what I want yet. Trying to get a phaser, a midi controller for the Space, a volume pedal, and expression or two. I’m forgetting a couple other things.
one thing i am still trying to figure out is which patch cables to go with. george l's or lavas? anyone have any opinions? ..
Danke!kbithecrowing wrote:^That's awesome.
I've heard some say—and this is just from a fine standpoint—that Lava ELC have such low capacitance that they add highs if you're running short cables and only a few true-bypass pedals and one or two buffered pedals. It's really hard to truly create a set-up that allows your tone to be as clear as humanely possible. Some companies, such as Diezel, actually design the front-end of their amplifiers with a specific cable and capacitance in mind. It's an interesting way of doing things and allows for more consistency and a truer representation of the designers original intent.Ancient Astronaught wrote:That EGC!!!!!That is EXACTLY what I would order if I got one, except it would be baritone scale. Everything else though is spot on to what I would want. Thats a sick rig dude!!!
I use lava's solderless kit on all my boards, as long as you dont swap pedals out on a constant basis they work great. If you do do alot of swapping you gotta make sure to tighten em up every time. They sound great IMO (well I should say they remove very little high end due to their low capacitance as they don't really have a "sound"). I have no experience with GL's though.
Cables dont add highs; they can only retain them.AngryGoldfish wrote:I've heard some say—and this is just from a fine standpoint—that Lava ELC have such low capacitance that they add highs if you're running short cables and only a few true-bypass pedals and one or two buffered pedals. It's really hard to truly create a set-up that allows your tone to be as clear as humanely possible. Some companies, such as Diezel, actually design the front-end of their amplifiers with a specific cable and capacitance in mind. It's an interesting way of doing things and allows for more consistency and a truer representation of the designers original intent.Ancient Astronaught wrote:That EGC!!!!!That is EXACTLY what I would order if I got one, except it would be baritone scale. Everything else though is spot on to what I would want. Thats a sick rig dude!!!
I use lava's solderless kit on all my boards, as long as you dont swap pedals out on a constant basis they work great. If you do do alot of swapping you gotta make sure to tighten em up every time. They sound great IMO (well I should say they remove very little high end due to their low capacitance as they don't really have a "sound"). I have no experience with GL's though.
/\ this is what I was going to say Dan. Cables can't ADD anything at all, there's no circuit, electronics or anything. What they can do is prevent loss, which can be perceived as adding in high end harmonic content due to the comparison of a higher capacitance cable which loses more high end (such as your standard 5$ guitar center cable). I've felt that since I've switched to the ELC cable my tone is the clearest and truest its ever been. Not saying other cables don't do the same, but I haven't felt the need to try any others since getting them.rustywire wrote:Cables dont add highs; they can only retain them.AngryGoldfish wrote:I've heard some say—and this is just from a fine standpoint—that Lava ELC have such low capacitance that they add highs if you're running short cables and only a few true-bypass pedals and one or two buffered pedals. It's really hard to truly create a set-up that allows your tone to be as clear as humanely possible. Some companies, such as Diezel, actually design the front-end of their amplifiers with a specific cable and capacitance in mind. It's an interesting way of doing things and allows for more consistency and a truer representation of the designers original intent.Ancient Astronaught wrote:That EGC!!!!!That is EXACTLY what I would order if I got one, except it would be baritone scale. Everything else though is spot on to what I would want. Thats a sick rig dude!!!
I use lava's solderless kit on all my boards, as long as you dont swap pedals out on a constant basis they work great. If you do do alot of swapping you gotta make sure to tighten em up every time. They sound great IMO (well I should say they remove very little high end due to their low capacitance as they don't really have a "sound"). I have no experience with GL's though.
In comparison to a high capacitance cable, yes you will notice more highs. But I can't see that as any kind of downfall unless your amp doesn't have a treble knob. I'd rather have the broadest spectrum of frequencies going into the amp. It's always better to subtract from whats all ready there, then try to make up for it artificially later. Sounds to me like an excuse from someone who doesn't want to admit that its a superior product, or a response from an envious competitor.AngryGoldfish wrote:Sorry, yeah, that's what I meant to say. I meant that some have said they noticed even more highs than going straight in with a 6 foot cable and no buffers or pedals. Some say the capacitance is too low.
I could definitely see that. Good call! I tend to use very dark sounding amps so it seems to balance out well for me, but if I was using a bright voiced amp I could see how it could turn shrill and ear piercing quickly.rustywire wrote:In some cases, the rolloff from high capacitance cable is just the fix needed to keep a bright amp [think AC30 top boost] from making your ears bleed with single coils/p90 in particular.
It can really hit an amp's sweetspot just right, with a frequency curve that differs from the sweep of standard high shelf tonestacks, graphic and even parametric EQs.
This is a good point. For me, because my Fryette is a really bright amp and the treble knob could be all the way off and it'll still have spank, I do want to make sure I'm maintaining the same tone. I love that about it—and I can always alter the core structure of the sound by changing the poweramp voicing switches to a smoother attack—but I certainly don't want to 'add' any more high-end than I already have. I just want to restore clarity and dynamics. My cables aren't cheap shitty things, but I would like to give ELC a shot when I have the money and invest in a different buffer.Ancient Astronaught wrote:In comparison to a high capacitance cable, yes you will notice more highs. But I can't see that as any kind of downfall unless your amp doesn't have a treble knob. I'd rather have the broadest spectrum of frequencies going into the amp. It's always better to subtract from whats all ready there, then try to make up for it artificially later. Sounds to me like an excuse from someone who doesn't want to admit that its a superior product, or a response from an envious competitor.
I tend to get caught up in calculating mathematically the capacitance levels of each cable and the inputs and outputs of each pedal, but as you say, there are just so many variables to consider.hbombgraphics wrote:the guitar/cables/pedals/amb combination has so many variables that it is almost impossible to make a definitive conclusion on what works well for everyone.
I go for cheap, durable, and flexible and with 25 pedals and tons of buffers and nonsense even radio shack cables sound pretty good.