Page 11 of 25
Re: Moog MiniFoogers!??!?!?!? Lookin true Ya'll
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 2:25 am
by skullservant
theavondon wrote:They kinda remind me of ARC Effects's aesthetic
Yeah! Totally this
Re: Moog MiniFoogers!??!?!?!? Lookin true Ya'll
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 3:36 am
by adapt
i guess now that moog's dropping pics of these i can say that i've messed with all of them
Re: Moog MiniFoogers!??!?!?!? Lookin true Ya'll
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 3:42 am
by phantasmagorovich
adapt wrote:i guess now that moog's dropping pics of these i can say that i've messed with all of them
And how where they? How does the delay compare to the bigger brothers?
Re: Moog MiniFoogers!??!?!?!? Lookin true Ya'll
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 6:48 am
by goroth
Stop talking delay phanta, it's all about the ring mod!
Re: Moog MiniFoogers!??!?!?!? Lookin true Ya'll
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 10:21 am
by Gone Fission
skullservant wrote:From Moog's IG:

Is it silly that I suddenly like the aesthetics instead of just hoping for good sound for the bucks? The 2d Sweetwater pic wasn't nearly so flattering.
Re: Moog MiniFoogers!??!?!?!? Lookin true Ya'll
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 12:33 pm
by adapt
they sounded good. delay and trem were the standouts for me, the ringmod did sound good, but it cant do trem. boost seemed kind of gimmicky but it still sounded pretty good. the drive was pretty cool too.
Re: Moog MiniFoogers!??!?!?!? Lookin true Ya'll
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 7:43 pm
by rfurtkamp
Are these actually domestic pedals or done in house still?
"By Moog" makes me...curious.
Re: Moog MiniFoogers!??!?!?!? Lookin true Ya'll
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 8:37 pm
by Mudfuzz
rfurtkamp wrote:Are these actually domestic pedals or done in house still?
"By Moog" makes me...curious.
This has been scratching at the back of my brain too.
Re: Moog MiniFoogers!??!?!?!? Lookin true Ya'll
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:41 pm
by adapt
all still made in house.
Re: Moog MiniFoogers!??!?!?!? Lookin true Ya'll
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:21 pm
by insubordination
Re: Moog MiniFoogers!??!?!?!? Lookin true Ya'll
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:33 pm
by Mudfuzz
Now I am happy.
Re: Moog MiniFoogers!??!?!?!? Lookin true Ya'll
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2013 11:39 pm
by hiorgos
...
Re: Moog MiniFoogers!??!?!?!? Lookin true Ya'll
Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:13 am
by greyscales
It looks like the drive isn't quite the low pass filter everyone was hoping for. Looks more like the Fairfield Four Eyes with the whole expression controlled peak filter/wah thing.
I don't get the idea of the tone control on the tremolo. It says it doesn't affect the dry signal.... but a trem is like a volume effect. How can it not affect the dry signal?
Either way they get me interested with the rotary speaker comment. Wonder if they just mean in the fast tremolo effect or if there is more modulation going on there. Hmmmm...
Re: Moog MiniFoogers!??!?!?!? Lookin true Ya'll
Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:16 am
by Mudfuzz
greyscales wrote:It looks like the drive isn't quite the low pass filter everyone was hoping for. Looks more like the Fairfield Four Eyes with the whole expression controlled peak filter/wah thing.
I don't get the idea of the tone control on the tremolo. It says it doesn't affect the dry signal.... but a trem is like a volume effect. How can it not affect the dry signal?
Either way they get me interested with the rotary speaker comment. Wonder if they just mean in the fast tremolo effect or if there is more modulation going on there. Hmmmm...
There are a few trems that do that, all it means is it only colors the trem side of the blend control. I like the specs on it so far

Re: Moog MiniFoogers!??!?!?!? Lookin true Ya'll
Posted: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:20 am
by greyscales
Okay, I see now that it uses phase cancellation for the tremolo effect. That makes a bit more sense in terms of the tone control. And it sounds interesting. Definitely curious about it now.