Page 2 of 3
Re: do we really need a robot guitar?
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 5:58 pm
by Blurillaz
no
Re: do we really need a robot guitar?
Posted: Wed Jan 13, 2010 6:01 pm
by elbandito
PumpkinPieces wrote:And fuck the robot guitar. Half the fun of drop D is strumming the first three strings and hearing the E string drop a whole step.
haha. too true.
Re: do we really need a robot guitar?
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:44 am
by Tag Intel
A robot tiger would be a win.
Re: do we really need a robot guitar?
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 1:01 pm
by thebarkpetition
Tag Intel wrote:A robot tiger would be a win.
- robot_tiger.jpg (19.25 KiB) Viewed 727 times
The robot tiger is made of win. The robot guitar, not so much. It's a solution for which there is no problem - tuning a guitar just isn't that difficult or inconvenient.
Re: do we really need a robot guitar?
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 2:32 pm
by Dr. Sherman Sticks M.D.
NewarkWilder wrote:i can tune just fine but i'm terrible about intonation... a guitar that could keep perfect intonation through whatever means necessary would probably be a good thing for me to have
ive never even messed with the intonation, i would be all like
having said that i rarely tune my guitar either, it seems to stay generally in tune pretty well.
kinda off topic but i used to like tuning my guitar to like 435 hz or somethin. just like off from the standard 440...i have no idea why.
Re: do we really need a robot guitar?
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:03 pm
by jrmy
Dr. Sherman Sticks M.D. wrote:NewarkWilder wrote:i can tune just fine but i'm terrible about intonation... a guitar that could keep perfect intonation through whatever means necessary would probably be a good thing for me to have
ive never even messed with the intonation, i would be all like
having said that i rarely tune my guitar either, it seems to stay generally in tune pretty well.
kinda off topic but i used to like tuning my guitar to like 435 hz or somethin. just like off from the standard 440...i have no idea why.
Not too off topic, since it was somewhat silly to begin with. On the off-standard tuning point, I've read that Led Zeppelin used to do the same.
Re: do we really need a robot guitar?
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 7:41 pm
by htsamurai
I always thought Justin Vernon did something like that on For Emma....
Re: do we really need a robot guitar?
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 1:54 pm
by McSpunckle
I wonder if Gibson bought that tiger, or if it's a rental.
Re: do we really need a robot guitar?
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 2:24 pm
by sevenSHARPnine
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIYYoeFB45Y[/youtube]
Re: do we really need a robot guitar?
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 5:01 am
by Tag Intel
Here is a terribly quick and dirty pic of Gibson's latest follies, all together. A tiger with a robot head wearing a zoot suit.
Now that I think about it, it makes me kinda sad.
Re: do we really need a robot guitar?
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 6:24 am
by SPACERITUAL
Re: do we really need a robot guitar?
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:29 am
by jrmy
Tag Intel wrote:Here is a terribly quick and dirty pic of Gibson's latest follies, all together. A tiger with a robot head wearing a zoot suit.
Now that I think about it, it makes me kinda sad.
You forgot to mention that it has since been impounded, because the body is built from illegally harvested endangered wood.
Re: do we really need a robot guitar?
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:44 am
by Bellyheart
I do like the zoot suit.
Re: do we really need a robot guitar?
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:42 pm
by 1,2,3, Pull Out!
- 300px-Tigatron-takaraprofile.jpg (31.7 KiB) Viewed 771 times
