Re: Tonebenders. Discuss.
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 9:42 pm
Yep. That's the sound of good ol' rock n' roll, all right! Damn. Now you've got me almost wanting a Tonebender.
NewarkWilder wrote:jrmy wrote:Damn, I wish I could solder. And understood electronics.Or electricity.
dude its really not hard. this is something i definitely just decided to try to learn and happened to catch on to the basics pretty quickly. I've still got a LOT to learn, but once you kind of understand how caps and resistors and diodes and transistors all manipulate an electrical current and turning it into an amplified sound, its cake![]()
its like you have a never ending waterfall. that is the electrical charge you are feeding it. All the electronics inside a pedal do is decide how that charge is routed when you play through it. the full circuit design just takes the note and splits it up, performs certain functions such as creating a certain distorted sound, monitors and controls noise levels and such and have it come out sounding like something you want it to on the other side. Its just mapping things out and experimenting with every stop along the way. Its like putting your note through an electrical cheese grater. its a lot of fun
NewarkWilder wrote:Scruffie wrote:Well i've built Tone Benders and I have a stock of 1950/60s mullards and I must say I love them, tried some AC128s and that just wasn't right, my favourite do have to be the OC81Ds their smoother flavour may be due to being the lowest hFe of all the Mullard Tone Bender transistors and also the reason why the versions that used transistors other than the 81Ds had different component values to cut the harshness off them.
I don't think what BYOC have are mullard... they're the old style glass transistors for sure but they could have been made by anyone, lots of the glass packages look like that, I don't think the Mullard part is too important, I have a NKT OC44 which is just as nice as a mullard but I think some of them were probably made very cheaply and badly and that's what those parts may be,.
You have to take the leakage of the transistors into account with the tone of the circuit aswell though, although the Tone Bender does like to have 1 leaky transistor in it having very leaky transistors will lead to a bad sound and also incorrect gain readings, if you buy an unmatched set you're gunna end up with a bad sound so I think that's why you're not gunna get the best sound from a kit, i've heard some god awful sounds coming out the circuit as have you.
My personal experience with my Tone Bender though, I love it, it's my go to fuzz and nails that babe i'm gunna leave you chorus by zeppelin and a properly built one can sound incredible, I also put some 60's mustard caps in with it and I will admit that normally I can't tell that much difference with cap differences but they did add some magic to it over the cheaper ceramics I used but mylars would probably be nice too.
Over transistors though... I really don't like the buy up of them that's occuring, I have a fear that alot will just end up sitting in peoples boxes that bought them just because they heard they were the best or in mass stocks hidden away somewhere, they should be available for use and not hoarded but the price is climbing fast as more and more people learn about DIY and less are available on the market after being bought up.
On the subject of Fuzz faces though... they can sound good with alot of germaniums, the myth they have to use AC128 is great for people that want to get the other germaniums that will sound better, AC128 weren't even good at the time just cheap and in large supply, I hear alot of good things about the newer russian Germaniums (which also sound good in Tone Benders apparently) I haven't personally built up a fuzz face yet though but I will be soon as i've heard enough about it now and it's time to finally try one.
There's alot of misinformation out there and probably always will be but if you take the time you can end up with some nice sounding vintage units, possibly improved over the original.
hell yeah Scruffie, awesome post, that is what I'm talking about. I think this is why I'm do interested in TBs--its kind of like watching an iconic, but endangered species going extinct.
the BYOC ones I got were Mullard, but for all I know they got some huge random lot of "NOS TRANSISTORS!!OMG!!" with various brands and such, I dunno. I have Phillips OC75s in my MK1 (I think! sorry if I'm wrong there dude!) built by SonicVI that sound great. I've had some OC75s with what I consider unacceptable leakage values but not too many thankfully... but what you said about possibly improving something--that is sort of where my head is right now. Nothing I'll be able to build will ever be as important than the original TBs, but I wonder what other directions you could take the circuit. Been thinking about that a lot lately, I have some ideas but none I've dug into. There are a lot of interesting lesser known components I want to do some experimenting with.
I just fear that in 10 years only rich people will have actual Tonebender pedals and everyone else will be using a model of one on the latest upgrade to Axe-FX.......