Wide-Range Humbucker vs Mini-Humbucker
Moderator: Ghost Hip
- Gone Fission
- IAMILFFAMOUS
- Posts: 4843
- Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 1:50 pm
- Location: The ungovernable tribal regions southwest of D.C.
- Contact:
Re: Wide-Range Humbucker vs Mini-Humbucker
Parallel humbucker coils is nice—more open and less congested while still hum canceling. You got me thinking about adding a strangle switch to my planned rewiring project.
D.o.S. wrote:Broadly speaking, if we at ILF are dropping 300 bucks on a pedal it probably sounds like an SNES holocaust.
friendship wrote:death to false bleep-blop
UglyCasanova wrote:brb gonna slap my dick on my stomp boxes
- Christophe
- committed
- Posts: 326
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2016 8:28 am
Re: Wide-Range Humbucker vs Mini-Humbucker
I have a set of Lollar Firebirds in a cheap Tele. Really great pups. I'd say the tone is tight, focused, compared to HBs. It does sound like a regular Tele with more punch. The bridge pick-up is totally usable in any context; the neck pick-up is really edgy. I don't know how to describe that, but they bring that smooth compression that's so enjoyable, and don't have the flubbyness of HBs.
I remember playing real WRHBs a long time ago and was in love with that sound. They might sound more open, bring less compression, than the firebirds, but still tighter than HBs.
I remember playing real WRHBs a long time ago and was in love with that sound. They might sound more open, bring less compression, than the firebirds, but still tighter than HBs.
"It's wrong but it works."