ilovefuzz.com

jrfox92 wrote:

BoatRich wrote:I have an EHX L2ube that I use for this sometimes? It doesn’t get super dirty but it’s a pretty solid boost/preamp sorta deal and it’s stereo.

I've wanted one of those for so long.
It's weird that they're so rare an no one has traced one yet, either.

I honestly didn’t even realize it was rare lol, I just bought it on the cheap at work because it looked cool. It’s fucking awesome for synth/warming up mixer sends into my interface.

The Source Audio LA Lady/Kingmaker/whatever (all the same inside, just pick the color and what 3 presets are loaded, but you can change 'em at will) is actual stereo if you want it to be (or parallel, or...).

There are tons of good sounds in the box as well, it's the first digital dirt I've actually *liked*.

strangeloved; timely

You say dual mono, I say stereo.

ok, wtf is that?!

manymanyhaha wrote:ok, wtf is that?!

crochambeau's secret santa gift to drod.

It's essentially a pair of 1v3 crustaceans sharing controls and driving output transformers. The biggest trick was fitting it all inside that shell.



Any dirt circuit can be employed in stereo, just get two and join them at the controls. PCB mounted pots simply need to be flown to dual gang. Single channel is vastly more popular, so I'd speculate that even high profile companies who take the dip are just using two standard monophonic circuits inside the same enclosure.

DRodriguez wrote:You say dual mono, I say stereo.

I did say dual mono didn't I? You are correct, dual mono would have had two sets of controls and defeated the purpose of putting it in a single box. Sometimes wording is not my strong suit.

it perrrttyy

I like the idea of stereo dirt but I would need two different flavors at least. Maybe a clean blend that could go to either side as well. Hmm...