Page 2 of 2

Re: Copperphone vs. Carbonphone

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 10:58 am
by Jwar
I didn't mean to replace the mic in general, I just meant that you could get a similar sound as what it's doing via Pro Tools or a comparable program. My brother is a wiz at that shit, that's the only reason I know that. He's been able to emulate almost anything in his studio that I've heard with any effect. Unless it's super unique. I was just curious in general if you could create those tones via programming. I get the want to not have it as processed though. Keeping it as raw as possible is best IMO too.

Re: Copperphone vs. Carbonphone

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:01 am
by D.o.S.
Yeah the answer to that is always going to be "yes", more or less, but if it detracts from your workflow it's not really a positive solution, IMO.

Re: Copperphone vs. Carbonphone

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:07 am
by DRodriguez
You could get close, it's just damn tricky. with a mic like the copperphone, the way it reacts to distance and angle/directionality will not be easily recreatable.

There are some interesting projects in mic simulation going on right now though. Check out the slate modeling mic. But stuff like that requires a calibrated microphone for the software.

Re: Copperphone vs. Carbonphone

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:09 am
by Jwar
D.o.S. wrote:Yeah the answer to that is always going to be "yes", more or less, but if it detracts from your workflow it's not really a positive solution, IMO.
Your mom is a positive solution.

Re: Copperphone vs. Carbonphone

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:16 am
by ritz
Ugly Nora wrote:That dude is a member here, so maybe he will chime in. But you should just email him. He is very nice and helpful. When I bought my Carbonphone, he gave me a 2 week money back guarantee to see if I liked it, which is super cool. But also, I was a bit of a special circumstance because I was asking him how it sounds with singing bowls and gongs and stuff, and he had no reference point to give me a true answer. So, I would not expect him to give that offer to everyone.
Nora, how do you like the Carbobnphone with bowls??

Re: Copperphone vs. Carbonphone

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:06 pm
by Ugly Nora
I haven't properly tested it. When I bought it, it was right before I moved, and it took me a few months to get setup in the new place. Awhile back when I was recoding samples onto my sp404 with it, I was getting a lot of noise in the sample which made it unusable.. I thought it was the mic because when I switched to another mic, a Calrad dm11, there wasn't much noise. But a few days later I realized it was probably my vintage Gretsch Tremofect pedal that was causing the noise. I haven't tried it since though, but have been meaning to try it soon anyway. I am not sure if I will like it or not though as it might be too distorted for my current taste and what I am trying to achieve sonically these days. Or I may love it. Who knows?

Re: Copperphone vs. Carbonphone

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:10 pm
by Chankgeez
In fact, I've heard a rumor the name of your next album is gonna be Nora Goes Hi-Fi. :!!!:

Re: Copperphone vs. Carbonphone

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 2:52 pm
by Ugly Nora
No, my next album is going to be called Nora tunes his guitar.

Re: Copperphone vs. Carbonphone

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 3:54 pm
by D.o.S.
sellout