Page 2 of 4

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:28 pm
by Dungus
popvulture wrote:Hark the fuckin' herald angels sing. I wish they'd all just leave that shit to Strymon.

EDIT: didn't they say there were going to be two versions though? I remember something about one at around $199, then a "crazier" one at around $300. I would hope at least the weirder one has reverse. We shall see.
I think the cheaper one is just the same as the more expensive one but with one reverb engine thingy instead of two. Can't imagine they'll have different sounds.

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:29 pm
by Dungus
popvulture wrote:
Dungus wrote:Was hoping the new Source Audio would do it, but it appears it doesn't. Och SHIT.
Where are you getting deets on this, Dungus? Just curious, wanna know more about the Source thing. Aren't there going to be two versions? Surprised at lack of reverse. :idk:
Found it - http://files.effectsdatabase.com/brands ... is_001.jpg

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2017 2:45 pm
by popvulture
D.o.S. wrote:"crazy" reverse reverb :lol:
Haha was more referring to more crazy sounds in general, dickus :lol:

Well, I'm nonetheless psyched to hear how this thing sounds, though I don't think I'll be buying any more complicated verb boxes for a long time.

Now that I think about it, it might be sorta admirable that they said fuck it re: reverse. Aside from shimmer, that's one of the hardest effects to make sound remotely original.

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:16 pm
by tremolo3
Dungus wrote: Saw a full frontal pic of it somewhere... probably here! I'll have a look for it. Yeah, it didn't have a reverse function on the scroll wheel thingy, so im assuming it doesn't feature. LOADS of shimmer no doubt, though. :facepalm:
I think you have access to another 12 additional algorithms that you can load with their app, or something like that... Not very familiar nor interested on their stuff but I think that's how their delay works.

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:17 pm
by D.o.S.
popvulture wrote:
D.o.S. wrote:"crazy" reverse reverb :lol:
Haha was more referring to more crazy sounds in general, dickus :lol:

Well, I'm nonetheless psyched to hear how this thing sounds, though I don't think I'll be buying any more complicated verb boxes for a long time.

Now that I think about it, it might be sorta admirable that they said fuck it re: reverse. Aside from shimmer, that's one of the hardest effects to make sound remotely original.
You can pretty easily make it sound lanigiro yletomer, though.

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2017 3:39 pm
by Willem
Dungus wrote:Was hoping the new Source Audio would do it, but it appears it doesn't. Och SHIT.

Are you sure it wouldn't as hidden algorithm with the neuro app?

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2017 4:34 pm
by Dungus
Willem wrote:
Dungus wrote:Was hoping the new Source Audio would do it, but it appears it doesn't. Och SHIT.

Are you sure it wouldn't as hidden algorithm with the neuro app?
Image

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2017 6:17 pm
by UglyCasanova
Yeah, the Source verb will have an additional 12 algorithms available through the app.
The Ventris is a powerful stereo reverb pedal featuring 24 distinct effect engines
I've swapped most of the panel presets on my Nemesis for other algorithms. I mean, why would I ever need slapback? :lol:

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2017 7:42 pm
by tremolo3
UglyCasanova wrote:I mean, why would I ever need slapback? :lol:
Because of Dead Kennedys? :snax:

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2017 7:45 pm
by UglyCasanova
Yeah...no. :erm:

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2017 7:47 pm
by tremolo3
mmmmkay

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2017 8:21 pm
by D.o.S.
UglyCasanova wrote:Yeah...no. :erm:
:|:

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2017 9:16 pm
by Faldoe
What's wrong with slapback?

To the OP - if you already have an Rv7 that's probably as good as your get without spending more or a bigger enclosure- like the Cathedral. I found most of the reverbs in it weren't that great but the reverse had a lot of options to tailor the sound.

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2017 9:45 pm
by UglyCasanova
D.o.S. wrote:
UglyCasanova wrote:Yeah...no. :erm:
:|:
I like DK, I just don't play that sort of stuff myself. :idk:

The digital delay on short time+repeats and the tone rolled back sounds EXACTLY like the slapback algo. There was absolutely no reason to have a dedicated slot for it on the face of the pedal. That was my point.

Re: Reverse Reverbs (sorry, this topic again)

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2017 9:59 pm
by tremolo3
UglyCasanova wrote:
D.o.S. wrote:
UglyCasanova wrote:Yeah...no. :erm:
:|:
I like DK, I just don't play that sort of stuff myself. :idk:

The digital delay on short time+repeats and the tone rolled back sounds EXACTLY like the slapback algo. There was absolutely no reason to have a dedicated slot for it on the face of the pedal. That was my point.
Wait, is there a "slapback" algo? WTF HAHAHA