Re: Another thread about Synths
Posted: Tue Sep 27, 2016 11:31 am
I dunno, finding a poly synth in the 300-400 price range with a full range of knobs is going to be hard. Even diy'in a mutable poly is going to cost more and still have limited control.
The esq-1's interface is pretty fluid and clear with the way they setup the display. I also find polysynths to have less of a need for real-time programming personally (kind of get the programming out of the way and it is more keyboard oriented). With monos and less voice synths, sure it is nice to give your other hand something to do (and make things seem more alive). I also think that a lot of these polys are setup with enough mod sources to kind of take care of the movement stuff, automated style.
A lot of modern poly synths still have very limited control (microkorg, op-1, tetra, etc).
Modern Dave Smith stuff may have a lot of knobs, but the programming almost feels less intuitive because there is still the screen for things like destination and to actually see what value you selected (which can be annoying)....and it has limited characters so it almost feels more difficult to me than the esq-1 (more values displayed on each page and less jumping around). I also just don't find myself tweaking knobs once I get a patch set...I kinda feel like my mod wheel, pitch, pedals, velocity, and after touch should be doing the work for me (but I've grown less tweaky with age and my first synths were the poly800 and redsound dark star).
There are polys out there with more ready control (like roland jx) but the feelings are fairly mixed. Yamaha reface might be nice, but mini keys... they all have flaws
That is just where I am coming from...I can totally understand the need for ready available, knob per function programming, it just isn't a deal breaker for me. On the other hand, all the different menus/os/synth schemes can get old and frustrating....so it is good to investigate and find something that works well with you as an individual.
Or get a jx-3p with the programmer and have the best of both worlds haha.
The esq-1's interface is pretty fluid and clear with the way they setup the display. I also find polysynths to have less of a need for real-time programming personally (kind of get the programming out of the way and it is more keyboard oriented). With monos and less voice synths, sure it is nice to give your other hand something to do (and make things seem more alive). I also think that a lot of these polys are setup with enough mod sources to kind of take care of the movement stuff, automated style.
A lot of modern poly synths still have very limited control (microkorg, op-1, tetra, etc).
Modern Dave Smith stuff may have a lot of knobs, but the programming almost feels less intuitive because there is still the screen for things like destination and to actually see what value you selected (which can be annoying)....and it has limited characters so it almost feels more difficult to me than the esq-1 (more values displayed on each page and less jumping around). I also just don't find myself tweaking knobs once I get a patch set...I kinda feel like my mod wheel, pitch, pedals, velocity, and after touch should be doing the work for me (but I've grown less tweaky with age and my first synths were the poly800 and redsound dark star).
There are polys out there with more ready control (like roland jx) but the feelings are fairly mixed. Yamaha reface might be nice, but mini keys... they all have flaws
That is just where I am coming from...I can totally understand the need for ready available, knob per function programming, it just isn't a deal breaker for me. On the other hand, all the different menus/os/synth schemes can get old and frustrating....so it is good to investigate and find something that works well with you as an individual.
Or get a jx-3p with the programmer and have the best of both worlds haha.


