ilovefuzz.com

Yusss

This looks pretty great. I really enjoy the Afterneath. This is definitely another flavor of Afterneath. It's definitely going to make it's way onto my want list. I want to use this with my Dreadbox and hook up my expression pedal and just go nuts on this thing.

perfect verb to pair with my incoming pretty years? probably.

Can someone, please, do a cover of this somehow incorporating the Transmisser?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_zLxPNUIqw[/youtube]

rustywire wrote:If only there were a toggle switch to enable EXP control of the Warp knob...

I wish they would do this w/ the Afterneath, too, which is the main appeal of that pedal for me. The Transmisser looks fabulous, but I'm not totally on fire about how it sounds...yet
Somehow makes me want a LAL Sandstorm instead - maybe my ears are just fatigued today

Chankgeez wrote:Can someone, please, do a cover of this somehow incorporating the Transmisser?

I was always partial to this version (Transmisser free in 1993, erm, 1996?):

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTHFujLor6o[/youtube]

Ev_O))) wrote:perfect verb to pair with my incoming pretty years? probably.

I'm not so sure. The pretty years and this can be dangerous to your amp in some settings and the py can kill the Transmisser's filter on others.

i put the Pretty Years in an FX loop of an always on pedal and I have no volume issues at all because I can control them on the other pedal. It's perfect. I'd love to try that combo. Plus you may get varying results running the Transmisser in front of the PY's versus behind. I doubt it would take the filter out that way.

I played this pedal about a month and a half ago because [REDACTED] and from that first moment I knew I needed it. Cannot fucking wait to get my hands on one or three

jwar wrote:i put the Pretty Years in an FX loop of an always on pedal and I have no volume issues at all because I can control them on the other pedal. It's perfect. I'd love to try that combo. Plus you may get varying results running the Transmisser in front of the PY's versus behind. I doubt it would take the filter out that way.

It's a matter of stacking resonant bands together more than volume.

coupleonapkins wrote: I wish they would do this w/ the Afterneath, too, which is the main appeal of that pedal for me.

You could maybe mod in an expression pedal. I've been thinking about doing it for the drag control.

cherler wrote:

coupleonapkins wrote: I wish they would do this w/ the Afterneath, too, which is the main appeal of that pedal for me.

You could maybe mod in an expression pedal. I've been thinking about doing it for the drag control.

Matt Weed is the coolest! It seems like a lot of people have modded their Afterneath for EXP (hard to believe it's nearly 2 years since it came out & I still don't have one ), which is why I'm kind of wondering why EQD never considered revising the build a la a V2 (but maybe I'm more alone in my thinking ). Also, I'm spoiled that so many other ILF-friendly builders basically cater to those kind of requests in the first place, soooooo.........

;;cry

coupleonapkins wrote:

cherler wrote:

coupleonapkins wrote: I wish they would do this w/ the Afterneath, too, which is the main appeal of that pedal for me.

You could maybe mod in an expression pedal. I've been thinking about doing it for the drag control.

Matt Weed is the coolest! It seems like a lot of people have modded their Afterneath for EXP (hard to believe it's nearly 2 years since it came out & I still don't have one ), which is why I'm kind of wondering why EQD never considered revising the build a la a V2 (but maybe I'm more alone in my thinking ). Also, I'm spoiled that so many other ILF-friendly builders basically cater to those kind of requests in the first place, soooooo.........

EQD def outgrew ILF.

I'm almost sure that the EQD guys said they didn't want to add EXP in because it only sounds good with subtle changes or something like that.

Very Cool

Inconuucl wrote:

jwar wrote:i put the Pretty Years in an FX loop of an always on pedal and I have no volume issues at all because I can control them on the other pedal. It's perfect. I'd love to try that combo. Plus you may get varying results running the Transmisser in front of the PY's versus behind. I doubt it would take the filter out that way.

It's a matter of stacking resonant bands together more than volume.

True. I still think it'd be ok, but only one way to tell. lol

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAaahTe4vjc[/youtube]