Re: MF102 vs Randy's Revenge?
Posted: Sat Oct 24, 2015 8:52 am
I had the mf-102 twice. It makes a really nice combo with the mf-101.
I actually like the trem better on the RR too, I just like the greater range on the Moog. RR sounds better though.lordgalvar wrote: And I actually liked the RR's trem a bit more for a blended sound*, which leads me to:
* Mopar vs GM againI guess that makes maestro the Ford
I just wanted to say mopar vs GM more than anything. Haha. They're both great haha.Chankgeez wrote:I actually like the trem better on the RR too, I just like the greater range on the Moog. RR sounds better though.lordgalvar wrote: And I actually liked the RR's trem a bit more for a blended sound*, which leads me to:
* Mopar vs GM againI guess that makes maestro the Ford
That is pretty much the sound I was talking about. It is awesome.BoatRich wrote:I've had the same power supply question multiple times. It sucks because I'm trying to get a Moog LPF and Phaser as well and I'm gonna have to find someway to power and bypass them all easily. (Looking into that pedal patchbay from the other thread because that dude's local and it can send CV?) Also is the dual LFO trem weirdness you're talking about where it seems to have almost a random rate on the tremolo when you set the rate higher than the frequency? (or vice versa? I can't remember) Because that's one of the cooler sounds I've found in it and it's easily sequencable which is nice.
As far as the Bitquest goes, I would fucking love one, but I use Ring Mod too much to have it in a multi effect without presets. I'll probably get one up to replace all the other type of modulation I'd like but never use+bit crush.