Page 2 of 6
Re: SMOKE SIGNALS. New effect pedal demo series...on weed.
Posted: Sun Jun 21, 2015 2:09 pm
by KaosCill8r
Disarm D'arcy wrote:Trips and blips. I like that.
Just send me some acid and glitchy weird pedals an I will demo them. For sound and science's sake I will fuck up what's left of my sanity. But send enough acid for the missus too. She will get jealous if I'm tripping and she's not.
Re: SMOKE SIGNALS. New effect pedal demo series...on weed.
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2015 10:32 am
by titbeard
EPISODE 1: BLOWN
Enjoy.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DiEWOjiKSc0[/youtube]
Re: SMOKE SIGNALS. New effect pedal demo series...on weed.
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2015 4:04 pm
by odontophobia
too much weed and beer, not enough emphasis on the gear for my liking.
Re: SMOKE SIGNALS. New effect pedal demo series...on weed.
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2015 4:20 pm
by Chankgeez
odontophobia wrote:too much weed and beer, not enough emphasis on the gear for my liking.
Weed and beer need to be provided to the viewing/listening audience as well.
Would make for a much better experience all around.
Re: SMOKE SIGNALS. New effect pedal demo series...on weed.
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2015 4:22 pm
by NDominy
titbeard is an upper echelon dude! I love the alternate approach to gear demos because most of them are lame as shit in my opinion. I got a better idea of what this pedal does by watching this dude fuck around with it and hearing his interpretation, in his words, of what the controls do. I can see how people might like the the standard demos, but there's a ton of those already. different approaches are good to try, right?
Also, that squelch-choppiness...fuck man. Chewy.
Re: SMOKE SIGNALS. New effect pedal demo series...on weed.
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2015 6:17 pm
by Ugly Nora
This guy single-handedly just set the legalization movement back 10 years.
Re: SMOKE SIGNALS. New effect pedal demo series...on weed.
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2015 6:20 pm
by UglyCasanova
Re: SMOKE SIGNALS. New effect pedal demo series...on weed.
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2015 6:42 pm
by titbeard
Ugly Nora wrote:This guy single-handedly just set the legalization movement back 10 years.
You've never seen the show High Maintenance, have you?
Re: SMOKE SIGNALS. New effect pedal demo series...on weed.
Posted: Mon Jun 22, 2015 8:21 pm
by blakestree
I wish the voice tracks were better... and that there was more smoking!
Re: SMOKE SIGNALS. New effect pedal demo series...on weed.
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2015 1:12 am
by rfurtkamp
Not my scene and it reminds me why I hate hanging out with stoners, but agreed on the 'needs better vocal track' - get a noise gate or SOMETHING for that amp too. It's just distracting as hell.
Re: SMOKE SIGNALS. New effect pedal demo series...on weed.
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2015 8:33 am
by Jwar
Ugly Nora wrote:This guy single-handedly just set the legalization movement back 10 years.
God I love your bluntness. Hahahahahahaha
I agree in a way.
Don't get it at all.
What's the appeal of him being high and drunk? lol
Re: SMOKE SIGNALS. New effect pedal demo series...on weed.
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2015 9:45 am
by Jero
jwar wrote:Ugly Nora wrote:This guy single-handedly just set the legalization movement back 10 years.
God I love your bluntness. Hahahahahahaha
I agree in a way.
Don't get it at all.
What's the appeal of him being high and drunk? lol
Yea for real. A little too over the top to me.
Re: SMOKE SIGNALS. New effect pedal demo series...on weed.
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2015 10:03 am
by D.o.S.
I listen to the Dead. I listen to Phish. I smoke pot. I love gear. I love nerding out about gear. I shut that shit off after 15 seconds. Holy fuck that was annoying as hell.
Re: SMOKE SIGNALS. New effect pedal demo series...on weed.
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2015 10:08 am
by KaosCill8r
You guys are being too harsh. I thought it was a great demo. Very entertaining I thought. There are enough boring demos being produced. Good to see one that represents the stoner musician. There are a lot of us out there.
Re: SMOKE SIGNALS. New effect pedal demo series...on weed.
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2015 10:09 am
by DarkAxel
I enjoyed it more than I thought I would. However, I think there needs to be at least a bit of playing clip before the talking
