Re: Best Fattening Modulation?
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 11:03 pm
My friend's Nimbus sounded absolutely amazing with guitar, never heard more lush reverb toans.
Deltaphoenix wrote:Check out Iron Ether Polytope, it is different than most another chorus out there.
The cosmichorus is the least chorus-y chorus I've ever heard. None of the cheese, only 80's if you want it to be at normal chorus settings, airy light flanger tones, extreme vibrato, ring mod tones. Don't disregard it. Also as Syl said, the tone knob.sylnau wrote:Cosmichorus V3
It has a tone knob.
I was gonna suggest a vibe.Deltaphoenix wrote:I know…to much $$$ for sure.Chankgeez wrote:Is that the new one with the built-in EQ?
Edit: Just looked, the sliders are to shape the waveform. Nifty.
Edit2: List price: $640 (Sale price from Sweetwater: $499.99)
Edit3:
I have a DC-3, it is also pretty nasty. Not fattening though.bigchiefbc wrote:Here's my suggestions:
The most fattening chorus I know of is the old Boss DC-2. They usually go for around 2 bills. If you want cheapz, the Behringer CC-300 sounds exactly the same, I've A/B'd them directly.
For flanger, the DOD flangers are the fattest ones I've heard. FX-75B for guitar, FX-72 for bass. IMO/IME, they put the Boss BF-2 to shame.
For phaser, the fattest one I've ever played is the old Morley deluxe, but they don't come up for sale often. After that, I'd go for the Whetstone.
Fattest trem I've played is the EHX wiggler.
I think the DC-3 is very different from the DC-2, honestly, but I've never played the 3 so I have no direct experience. The 2 is analog and fat, and is actually pretty subtle with very little movement to the chorus. It's more of a doubler effect honestly.Iommic Pope wrote:
I have a DC-3, it is also pretty nasty. Not fattening though.
Just Satan, in a pink box.
My mate had a DOD flanger, I can attest to that.
Was that Morley like a wah box, green?
I do indeed still have the Morley. It's awesome, especially when paired with fuzz.bigchiefbc wrote:I think the DC-3 is very different from the DC-2, honestly, but I've never played the 3 so I have no direct experience. The 2 is analog and fat, and is actually pretty subtle with very little movement to the chorus. It's more of a doubler effect honestly.Iommic Pope wrote:
I have a DC-3, it is also pretty nasty. Not fattening though.
Just Satan, in a pink box.
My mate had a DOD flanger, I can attest to that.
Was that Morley like a wah box, green?
No, the Morley was in a huge black box that weighs a ton. I had one for a couple years and sold mine to jrmy. I think he still has it.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=on48-idws5k[/youtube]
Interestingly enough, I don't think the Whetstone is very fat sounding. It seems to cut bass with my set up.bigchiefbc wrote:After that, I'd go for the Whetstone.
The Whetstone has a lowpass mode, did you try that? I can't imagine that would cut any bass.Chankgeez wrote:Interestingly enough, I don't think the Whetstone is very fat sounding. It seems to cut bass with my set up.bigchiefbc wrote:After that, I'd go for the Whetstone.
Interesting, I never noticed any bass loss. But I EQ my bass pretty mid-heavy anyway.Chankgeez wrote:Yeah, I've tried the lowpass mode. It sounds too muffled that way... and it still kinda cuts bass.
That sounds so thick! And lush!jrmy wrote:I do indeed still have the Morley. It's awesome, especially when paired with fuzz.bigchiefbc wrote:I think the DC-3 is very different from the DC-2, honestly, but I've never played the 3 so I have no direct experience. The 2 is analog and fat, and is actually pretty subtle with very little movement to the chorus. It's more of a doubler effect honestly.Iommic Pope wrote:
I have a DC-3, it is also pretty nasty. Not fattening though.
Just Satan, in a pink box.
My mate had a DOD flanger, I can attest to that.
Was that Morley like a wah box, green?
No, the Morley was in a huge black box that weighs a ton. I had one for a couple years and sold mine to jrmy. I think he still has it.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=on48-idws5k[/youtube]