Page 2 of 2

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 2:14 pm
by misterstomach
Incredible post.

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 3:13 pm
by new05002
thank u

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 3:56 pm
by ChetMagongalo
Pretty cool, I didn't know a lot of amps more or less followed the same EQ design

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 6:01 pm
by phantasmagorovich
Nice. Who would've known that by backing off bass and treble and cranking mids you'd get a more or less flat EQ. I'll have to try that if only for fun.

What about the Selmer T'nB? That one only has Treble 'n Bass control (hence the name) do you know anything about that one?
I have been thinking about this amp too much. Maybe I should've bought it after all.

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 6:25 pm
by new05002
the scheme looks like a FMV with fixed mid control

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:03 am
by friendship
This is great information. I had no idea that cranking everything in a common FMV EQ setup would result in a midrange (I've actually never really done that).

I have a Trace Elliot amp that uses a single tone knob, but they designed it so that, as you turned the knob clockwise, the midrange would decrease while the treble would increase. So you could get a midrange "boost" (it's passive so probably it's subtractive and relative EQ perception) turned counter clockwise, and a scooped treble boost the other way. It's very useful. There's also a bright switch that has a less dramatic effect the louder the amp gets, by design, which is nice for not razoring through everyone's eardrums.

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Posted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 5:54 pm
by AngryGoldfish
friendship wrote:This is great information. I had no idea that cranking everything in a common FMV EQ setup would result in a midrange (I've actually never really done that).

I have a Trace Elliot amp that uses a single tone knob, but they designed it so that, as you turned the knob clockwise, the midrange would decrease while the treble would increase. So you could get a midrange "boost" (it's passive so probably it's subtractive and relative EQ perception) turned counter clockwise, and a scooped treble boost the other way. It's very useful. There's also a bright switch that has a less dramatic effect the louder the amp gets, by design, which is nice for not razoring through everyone's eardrums.

That sounds like the Shape knob that some Orange amps use, like the TH100 and TH30 amps.

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:40 pm
by Hacken
Nice post! Gotta try out more settings on my Marshall now. The Lemmy trick seems like a good thing in a band setting.

Any knowledge about the Sound City Mark IV active eq?

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:41 pm
by new05002
Yea in that EQ what they did was split the signal into 3 different passive filters, then had a gain stage for each filtered signal, and mixed them all back together

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 7:55 pm
by AxAxSxS
I read this twice when you posted on tb, (I sometimes lurk there) Glad you posted it here as well as I'm getting ready to dive back in. I think I get a little bit more with each read. Really awesome of you Nick
:doom:

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2014 2:23 pm
by patdcp
Digging out this old thread, i know, but can you do such a graphic for modern Matamps ? Gt1/Gt2? ;-)
Thanks,Pat

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2014 2:40 pm
by new05002
patdcp wrote:Digging out this old thread, i know, but can you do such a graphic for modern Matamps ? Gt1/Gt2? ;-)
Thanks,Pat
If I had a schematic I could