Discussion On Amp EQs

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

User avatar
misterstomach
FAMOUS
FAMOUS
Posts: 1610
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2012 7:23 pm
Location: portland, or

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Post by misterstomach »

Incredible post.
ryan summit wrote:Damn these fuckin bullshit techherpes
User avatar
new05002
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 3870
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:07 pm

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Post by new05002 »

thank u
User avatar
ChetMagongalo
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4393
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 6:22 am
Location: Denton, TX

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Post by ChetMagongalo »

Pretty cool, I didn't know a lot of amps more or less followed the same EQ design
Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/crazyfalconX/videos
rustywire wrote:Post your battle jacket of wrong bands
psychic vampire. wrote:I believe all authorities should be destroyed?
User avatar
phantasmagorovich
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 6983
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:31 pm
Location: Cologne, Germany

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Post by phantasmagorovich »

Nice. Who would've known that by backing off bass and treble and cranking mids you'd get a more or less flat EQ. I'll have to try that if only for fun.

What about the Selmer T'nB? That one only has Treble 'n Bass control (hence the name) do you know anything about that one?
I have been thinking about this amp too much. Maybe I should've bought it after all.
User avatar
new05002
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 3870
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:07 pm

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Post by new05002 »

the scheme looks like a FMV with fixed mid control
User avatar
friendship
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4182
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 5:22 pm

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Post by friendship »

This is great information. I had no idea that cranking everything in a common FMV EQ setup would result in a midrange (I've actually never really done that).

I have a Trace Elliot amp that uses a single tone knob, but they designed it so that, as you turned the knob clockwise, the midrange would decrease while the treble would increase. So you could get a midrange "boost" (it's passive so probably it's subtractive and relative EQ perception) turned counter clockwise, and a scooped treble boost the other way. It's very useful. There's also a bright switch that has a less dramatic effect the louder the amp gets, by design, which is nice for not razoring through everyone's eardrums.
sound journal
actualidiot wrote:12-bit's almost analog, right?
User avatar
AngryGoldfish
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 3527
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 7:57 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Post by AngryGoldfish »

friendship wrote:This is great information. I had no idea that cranking everything in a common FMV EQ setup would result in a midrange (I've actually never really done that).

I have a Trace Elliot amp that uses a single tone knob, but they designed it so that, as you turned the knob clockwise, the midrange would decrease while the treble would increase. So you could get a midrange "boost" (it's passive so probably it's subtractive and relative EQ perception) turned counter clockwise, and a scooped treble boost the other way. It's very useful. There's also a bright switch that has a less dramatic effect the louder the amp gets, by design, which is nice for not razoring through everyone's eardrums.

That sounds like the Shape knob that some Orange amps use, like the TH100 and TH30 amps.
Catalinbread⁞⁞Earthquaker Devices⁞⁞Strymon⁞⁞Smallsound/Bigsound
Iron Ether⁞⁞Black Arts Toneworks⁞⁞Dr. Scientist⁞⁞Fairfield Circuitry
Tom Anderson⁞⁞Ibanez⁞⁞Guild⁞⁞Gretsch⁞⁞Fryette⁞⁞Audio Kitchen

Doom Room - type fast, riff slow
Hacken
committed
committed
Posts: 400
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2011 5:16 am

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Post by Hacken »

Nice post! Gotta try out more settings on my Marshall now. The Lemmy trick seems like a good thing in a band setting.

Any knowledge about the Sound City Mark IV active eq?
User avatar
new05002
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 3870
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:07 pm

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Post by new05002 »

Yea in that EQ what they did was split the signal into 3 different passive filters, then had a gain stage for each filtered signal, and mixed them all back together
User avatar
AxAxSxS
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 4832
Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 4:57 pm

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Post by AxAxSxS »

I read this twice when you posted on tb, (I sometimes lurk there) Glad you posted it here as well as I'm getting ready to dive back in. I think I get a little bit more with each read. Really awesome of you Nick
:doom:
Band=InfiniteFlux Flux on Bandcamp
"Ingenuity comes in the face of adversity, and nobody ever becomes a legend by following the rules set by society" -A.A.
Corey Y wrote:it's not obsessive gear hoarding. ;)
Infinite Flux full sets and demo's on youtube
whiskey_face wrote:that girl can fucking hit lemme tell you :love: :lol:
https://infiniteflux.bandcamp.com/
patdcp
interested
interested
Posts: 13
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2014 9:35 am

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Post by patdcp »

Digging out this old thread, i know, but can you do such a graphic for modern Matamps ? Gt1/Gt2? ;-)
Thanks,Pat
User avatar
new05002
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 3870
Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:07 pm

Re: Discussion On Amp EQs

Post by new05002 »

patdcp wrote:Digging out this old thread, i know, but can you do such a graphic for modern Matamps ? Gt1/Gt2? ;-)
Thanks,Pat
If I had a schematic I could
Post Reply