Re: Ok, ILF. I narrowed it down.
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 8:20 pm
I can't argue with tight pants. Carbonita had shake appeal, though.
Page 2 of 2
Re: Ok, ILF. I narrowed it down.
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 9:49 pm
Re: Ok, ILF. I narrowed it down.
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:41 pm
gooby why u do dis?
Re: Ok, ILF. I narrowed it down.
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 12:20 am
Zounds Perspex wrote:I can't argue with tight pants. Carbonita had shake appeal, though.
tight pants?
shake appeal?
weird?
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVa4iPSMa9c[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6gUsXJPync[/youtube]
Re: Ok, ILF. I narrowed it down.
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 12:39 am
i can't see that at work, chank, but is it Iggy + Stooges? that's what I was going for after aen's "tight pants" comment.
Re: Ok, ILF. I narrowed it down.
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 12:44 am
Zounds Perspex wrote:i can't see that at work, chank, but is it Iggy + Stooges? that's what I was going for after aen's "tight pants" comment.
Yes, indeed.
I got your reference, but couldn't tell if it was random or not.
Re: Ok, ILF. I narrowed it down.
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 2:05 am
Nope, not random. Nice catch! 