sonidero wrote:Right this second I'm playin a '67 Kalamazoo Reverb 12 with a '65 Kalamazoo Model 2 on top
is that the bass amp with the weird power tubes? i really want one of those. there's this particular Gibson amp tone i've been chasing for ages and that particular amp is the inexpensive way there.
In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
FIFTY YEARS OF SCARING THE CHILDREN 1970-2020--and i'm not done yet
dubkitty wrote:Bassman heads with 1x12" cabinets might also work.
dubkitty wrote:
sonidero wrote:Right this second I'm playin a '67 Kalamazoo Reverb 12 with a '65 Kalamazoo Model 2 on top
is that the bass amp with the weird power tubes?
No it's the lil "harp" amp with a 10"... Sounds sweet and looks and smells brand new... I always go by how my amps smell... Beer and mildew and cat piss, no thanks... Tolex and warm tube and 45 year old dust, please and thank you...
For my stereo set-up I use a VOX AC4TV and an Epi Valve Jr.. A lot less wattage then what you're wanting but it's fine for my needs. I say get a different amp then what you already have. I like the tonal differences myself.
It all depends what your idea of going stereo is. Do you want to run into two different sounding amps, maybe through two different mono pedal chains? Do you want the stereo outs of your pedal rig going into two identical (or not) amps? Do you want to stay mono until stereo-izing with effects in the amp loop or between a mono pre and stereo power amp? Do you want a Dry/Wet rig or a L-Wet/Dry/R-Wet rig? There are a hell of a lot of ways to go on this, and recommending an amp without an idea of the plan is a little sketchy.
IMO, stereo time-based effects generally work better on record than live. I tend to prefer either adding a complementary amp to the same pedal chain or doing different effects chains.
D.o.S. wrote:Broadly speaking, if we at ILF are dropping 300 bucks on a pedal it probably sounds like an SNES holocaust.
friendship wrote:death to false bleep-blop
UglyCasanova wrote:brb gonna slap my dick on my stomp boxes