rfurtkamp wrote:There is far more to the story than this video, including more reasons as to why Cort is shitty. Often times though, these corporations escapee responsibilities because they hire third-party factory owners who do all the dirty work. So if a dispute arises, or its found that working conditions are horrific, its either rationalized because "at least they have a job" (aka: exploitation is okay) or "we didn't know and its not our responsibilities. Thats the factory owners job."
I don't expect each country to adhere to some sort of mythical perfect standard that we have devised here or in academia. "Horrific" standards vary substantially from one country to the next; I am not enough of a bastard imperialist pig to determine what standards a people are required to work under. Too much "white man's burden", 21rst century style for me, thanks.
They can quit their jobs, they can protest, they can make these videos, they have options and recourse to the law in South Korea. I'm sure it's not perfect (or necessarily even all accurate, given that you could put together the same sort of one-sided video with employee complaints anywhere in the world for that matter with enough effort and time), but the chance for freedom and self-determination is a double-edged sword that's worth it. I could just compare SK to North Korea and most of the complaints that the video mentions seem sort of insignificant to be honest.
If you want stuff crafted to 'living wage' standards etc. hire somebody to build one under your own direct observation to ensure no exploitation and pay the premium for it.
Truth is most people don't care that much, nor should they.
Listen, my intention was not to argue with you on my initial response. It was to generate a discussion.
We play a role in Cort's manufacturing, and we can't just claim theres no responsibility here. I said that it was mostly the corporations and the third-party factories that are responsible for this, not necessarily the consumers. However, our actions (purchasing power) reproduce these conditions. Claiming that I have no part in "white mans guilt" is not an excuse, or even a valid argument because whether you want to accept it or not, we benefit as a result of other peoples misery. I'm not white, but I am a settler here just like you. However, I don't feel guilty about this, its not my fault, but at the very least I consider it and have a conscious about it.
If you're claiming that being in solidarity with workers in SK is imperialist, then you are misinformed (I realize that comment was tongue-in-cheek). The workers there are asking for global support, there is nothing imperialist about supporting them.
I'm not going to convince you that this is constitutes as poor labour standards, but you proved my point. You rationalize your position as "insignificant" based on the same arguments made by corporate apologists; they could quit their jobs because they have a "free" choice (yes, because thats realistic in order to pay rent and food, or I can choose to starve...); it's a contract dispute (so lets say the protection of labour standards are not in the contract, does it still make it okay?); they should be thankful they have a job and stop complaining because others (i.e NK) have it worse (as though a "lesser" form of repression makes it okay) etc. It's the same arguments used to bust unions and scale back on labour rights worldwide.
Its not no one who cares, its mostly docile North American's who can't seem to comprehend or understand the human impact of the economy. Several movements in the global south would gladly disagree with you about not caring.
Ps: Hiring someone to build a better product, or having "fair traded" products in the market are not a solution to a wider systemic problem either.