ilovefuzz.com

Posted: **Tue Jan 25, 2011 4:30 am**

bob the r0bot wrote:
Achtane wrote:More frets = more jangle

all hail the king of the jangles

Hail to the king baby.

Posted: **Tue Jan 25, 2011 8:48 pm**

im sorry, but Conklin just wins any "most frets" competition.

Posted: **Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:34 pm**

tony iommi wanted gibson to build him a 24 fret sg in the seventies and they would not. :mope:

if i have a 24th fret at some point i will hit it at the high e and it will be good! if i dont, and i usually dont, no big deal. :idk:

Posted: **Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:55 pm**

Gearmond wrote:i can get 24 frets for like 70 bucks though...

but can you get a rick for $70? :hobbes:

Posted: **Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:58 pm**

Jero wrote:
Gearmond wrote:i can get 24 frets for like 70 bucks though...

but can you get a rick for $70?

u give the rest in SEX

Posted: **Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:43 pm**

Gearmond wrote:
randel_07 wrote:for fun.
and justification for the price they charge

i can get 24 frets for like 70 bucks though...

It's important they go on a piece of wood though.

Posted: **Wed Jan 26, 2011 3:22 pm**

They don't. This is a '69 Rickenbacker...

Posted: **Wed Jan 26, 2011 5:11 pm**

elbandito wrote:They don't. This is a '69 Rickenbacker...

its a 600, not a 300. no one cares about 600 ricks :P

Question for the Ages