EH STEREO PULSAR: Your thoughts?

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

User avatar
sevenSHARPnine
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2722
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:56 pm
Location: Orange County, California

Re: EH STEREO PULSAR: Your thoughts?

Post by sevenSHARPnine »

bigchiefbc wrote:I'm sure a lot of you know this already, but I'll say it anyways. Most people think they perceive a volume drop when using tremolo. This is because tremolos are at unity volume at the top of their cycle, and at less than unity for the rest of the cycle. That means that on average, the volume of the signal is lower than unity. But it does not mean that the pedal is causing a volume drop; its just a trick of the ear based on our perception. Many boutique tremolos overcome this perception by boosting the signal afterwards, to bring the average volume level back up to unity (which means the peaks are actually boosted higher than unity).

Image
McSpunckle wrote:Pee, on the other hand, is full of other things that make it more conductive. That's why you don't pee outside in a lightning storm without first putting on your steel dick sheath.
htsamurai wrote:sharpie is my hero and lover
http://www.youtube.com/sevensharpnine
User avatar
Big Mon
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 7920
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 4:07 am
Location: SE US

Re: EH STEREO PULSAR: Your thoughts?

Post by Big Mon »

I onced owned the Pulsar and found it to be quite useful. Wouldn't have sold it at all if I hadn't bought an amp with onboard trem shortly thereafter. For the price,it's awesome :thumb:
User avatar
bigchiefbc
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 7313
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:45 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: EH STEREO PULSAR: Your thoughts?

Post by bigchiefbc »

sevenSHARPnine wrote:
bigchiefbc wrote:I'm sure a lot of you know this already, but I'll say it anyways. Most people think they perceive a volume drop when using tremolo. This is because tremolos are at unity volume at the top of their cycle, and at less than unity for the rest of the cycle. That means that on average, the volume of the signal is lower than unity. But it does not mean that the pedal is causing a volume drop; its just a trick of the ear based on our perception. Many boutique tremolos overcome this perception by boosting the signal afterwards, to bring the average volume level back up to unity (which means the peaks are actually boosted higher than unity).

Image


Can't tell if that's sarcastic or not, so:
Image
Buy my gear! viewtopic.php?f=44&t=58763
Achtane wrote:I can hit it with a Blowing Up and it'll just sound awesome instead of like capacitors farting into each others' dicks.
Achtane wrote:
last.fm wrote:Zs makes music that is variously categorized as no-wave, post-jazz, brutal-chamber, brutal-prog, and post minimalist.
srsly?

Fuck you.
User avatar
sevenSHARPnine
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2722
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:56 pm
Location: Orange County, California

Re: EH STEREO PULSAR: Your thoughts?

Post by sevenSHARPnine »

bigchiefbc wrote:
sevenSHARPnine wrote:
bigchiefbc wrote:I'm sure a lot of you know this already, but I'll say it anyways. Most people think they perceive a volume drop when using tremolo. This is because tremolos are at unity volume at the top of their cycle, and at less than unity for the rest of the cycle. That means that on average, the volume of the signal is lower than unity. But it does not mean that the pedal is causing a volume drop; its just a trick of the ear based on our perception. Many boutique tremolos overcome this perception by boosting the signal afterwards, to bring the average volume level back up to unity (which means the peaks are actually boosted higher than unity).

Image


Can't tell if that's sarcastic or not, so:
Image

no sarcasm at all! thanks for the butt though :hug:
McSpunckle wrote:Pee, on the other hand, is full of other things that make it more conductive. That's why you don't pee outside in a lightning storm without first putting on your steel dick sheath.
htsamurai wrote:sharpie is my hero and lover
http://www.youtube.com/sevensharpnine
User avatar
bigchiefbc
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 7313
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:45 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: EH STEREO PULSAR: Your thoughts?

Post by bigchiefbc »

sevenSHARPnine wrote:
bigchiefbc wrote:Can't tell if that's sarcastic or not, so:
Image

no sarcasm at all! thanks for the butt though :hug:


any time!

:surprise:
Buy my gear! viewtopic.php?f=44&t=58763
Achtane wrote:I can hit it with a Blowing Up and it'll just sound awesome instead of like capacitors farting into each others' dicks.
Achtane wrote:
last.fm wrote:Zs makes music that is variously categorized as no-wave, post-jazz, brutal-chamber, brutal-prog, and post minimalist.
srsly?

Fuck you.
User avatar
theavondon
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 10742
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:58 am
Location: Denton, TX

Re: EH STEREO PULSAR: Your thoughts?

Post by theavondon »

sevenSHARPnine wrote:
theavondon wrote:I used one once, and it seemed like there was volume drop, followed by volume increase, followed by drop at regular intervals.

it seems like every tremolo I try has this problem.

:p



Go figure............................
TAKE ME TO YOUR LEADER
User avatar
futuresailors
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 8075
Joined: Tue Oct 13, 2009 5:31 pm

Re: EH STEREO PULSAR: Your thoughts?

Post by futuresailors »

theavondon wrote:
sevenSHARPnine wrote:
theavondon wrote:I used one once, and it seemed like there was volume drop, followed by volume increase, followed by drop at regular intervals.

it seems like every tremolo I try has this problem.

:p



Go figure............................


:lol: :lol: :lol:
I just got that half a page later... :facepalm:
Tom Dalton wrote:You're a dumbass for making this thread to begin with. :hello:
magiclawnchair wrote:fuck that bitter old man
smile_man wrote:
ifeellikeatourist wrote: Pedals aren't everything, yada, yada, yeah I know.
fuck you.
McSpunckle wrote:I ctrl+f'd mountain goats and decided we aren't friends anymore.
User avatar
sevenSHARPnine
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2722
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:56 pm
Location: Orange County, California

Re: EH STEREO PULSAR: Your thoughts?

Post by sevenSHARPnine »

futuresailors wrote:I just got that half a page later... :facepalm:

better late than NEVAR :animal:
McSpunckle wrote:Pee, on the other hand, is full of other things that make it more conductive. That's why you don't pee outside in a lightning storm without first putting on your steel dick sheath.
htsamurai wrote:sharpie is my hero and lover
http://www.youtube.com/sevensharpnine
User avatar
veteransdaypoppy
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2649
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:17 am

Re: EH STEREO PULSAR: Your thoughts?

Post by veteransdaypoppy »

bigchiefbc wrote:I'm sure a lot of you know this already, but I'll say it anyways. Most people think they perceive a volume drop when using tremolo. This is because tremolos are at unity volume at the top of their cycle, and at less than unity for the rest of the cycle. That means that on average, the volume of the signal is lower than unity. But it does not mean that the pedal is causing a volume drop; its just a trick of the ear based on our perception. Many boutique tremolos overcome this perception by boosting the signal afterwards, to bring the average volume level back up to unity (which means the peaks are actually boosted higher than unity).

That makes sense, and that's what I'd figured, but.. regardless if there's an actual volume drop or if the pedal is perceived as quieter to the player, an audience still would hear it as being quieter, no?
Honestly, I thought the Stereo Pulsar was a pretty fantastic tremolo pedal. It can do really, really crazy things. I just don't use it live 'cuz I'm a lead guitar player and I need that tiny bit of gain/volume boost that the tremolessence gives me. That, and most of the time I play live, I'm tap dancing on my stompboxes.
Now that I know that, I always buy effects that have their own volume control.
:idk:
Hope I didn't come off like a douche. I really didn't mean to.
well i guess, but i just don't know.

dollys
User avatar
veteransdaypoppy
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2649
Joined: Wed Mar 25, 2009 1:17 am

Re: EH STEREO PULSAR: Your thoughts?

Post by veteransdaypoppy »

theavondon wrote:I used one once, and it seemed like there was volume drop, followed by volume increase, followed by drop at regular intervals.

just buy a fuzzbox! :)*
:lol:
well i guess, but i just don't know.

dollys
User avatar
sevenSHARPnine
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2722
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:56 pm
Location: Orange County, California

Re: EH STEREO PULSAR: Your thoughts?

Post by sevenSHARPnine »

no douchebaggery was perceived :thumb:
McSpunckle wrote:Pee, on the other hand, is full of other things that make it more conductive. That's why you don't pee outside in a lightning storm without first putting on your steel dick sheath.
htsamurai wrote:sharpie is my hero and lover
http://www.youtube.com/sevensharpnine
User avatar
bigchiefbc
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 7313
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:45 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: EH STEREO PULSAR: Your thoughts?

Post by bigchiefbc »

veteransdaypoppy wrote:
bigchiefbc wrote:I'm sure a lot of you know this already, but I'll say it anyways. Most people think they perceive a volume drop when using tremolo. This is because tremolos are at unity volume at the top of their cycle, and at less than unity for the rest of the cycle. That means that on average, the volume of the signal is lower than unity. But it does not mean that the pedal is causing a volume drop; its just a trick of the ear based on our perception. Many boutique tremolos overcome this perception by boosting the signal afterwards, to bring the average volume level back up to unity (which means the peaks are actually boosted higher than unity).

That makes sense, and that's what I'd figured, but.. regardless if there's an actual volume drop or if the pedal is perceived as quieter to the player, an audience still would hear it as being quieter, no?
Honestly, I thought the Stereo Pulsar was a pretty fantastic tremolo pedal. It can do really, really crazy things. I just don't use it live 'cuz I'm a lead guitar player and I need that tiny bit of gain/volume boost that the tremolessence gives me. That, and most of the time I play live, I'm tap dancing on my stompboxes.
Now that I know that, I always buy effects that have their own volume control.
:idk:
Hope I didn't come off like a douche. I really didn't mean to.


Yeah, everyone will perceive it as a volume drop, because its the way our ears work. And like I said, this is widespread enough that most boutique trems DO include a boost to fix that issue. I just wanted to make sure you understood that it wasn't an issue with that particular trem, but with trems in general. No douche-ness I could see, its cool :thumb:
Buy my gear! viewtopic.php?f=44&t=58763
Achtane wrote:I can hit it with a Blowing Up and it'll just sound awesome instead of like capacitors farting into each others' dicks.
Achtane wrote:
last.fm wrote:Zs makes music that is variously categorized as no-wave, post-jazz, brutal-chamber, brutal-prog, and post minimalist.
srsly?

Fuck you.
User avatar
floating opera
committed
committed
Posts: 336
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 3:02 pm
Contact:

Re: EH STEREO PULSAR: Your thoughts?

Post by floating opera »

honestly. i think i lot of ppl just get off saying suchandsuchapedal either sucks tone or has a volume drop.

:)*
Tom Dalton wrote: The problem wasn't that it was a guy tonguing another guy's ass...it's that anyone was tonguing anyone's ass.
User avatar
ateah
committed
committed
Posts: 197
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 7:38 pm
Location: Richmond is a hole, va

Re: EH STEREO PULSAR: Your thoughts?

Post by ateah »

you guys are so nice to each other. :omg:
User avatar
Jero
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 11288
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 1:12 am
Location: here

Re: EH STEREO PULSAR: Your thoughts?

Post by Jero »

ateah wrote:you guys are so nice to each other. :omg:

go to hell




:hug: just kidding
I make noise toys under Stomping Stones
[url=http://www.stompingstones.com[/url]
oldangelmidnight wrote:This is the classic ILF I love. Emotional highs and lows. Scooped mids in my heart all day long.
Post Reply