three colors: green, pink, black
matching headstock
trem arm with adjustable tightness
$699 street
https://guildguitars.com/g/surfliner-de ... -metallic/
walkthrough/inspection
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inzMD4aJzX4


Moderator: Ghost Hip
Didn't the original Replicator have a bunch of noise and reliability issues? Did those get resolved with the later D'Luxe model? I am just a bit skeptical regarding this new Binson but a real spinning disc echo is pretty fucking cool. The only other company I would expect to do something remotely similar would be Gamechanger Audio, as I expect they must be working on a delay with some sort of gimmick and a spinning disc wouldn't be out of their jurisdiction.echorec wrote: One of the selling points of the Replicator was a unit that didn't need much maintenance and could easily be cleaned and maintained by someone with no knowledge of tape machines.
The type of tape they used meant the unit was always going to be quite lo-fi. They did manage to shrink down the tape machine though, and in theory it was conceived to be low maintenance. I got two really early units. I flipped a spare untouched and got no complaints, so I think that one was fine. The one I was using had to be sent back to Denmark to be serviced. I was told by one of their top guys that they had quietly changed some things during the Replicator's production run. They never officially announced they were rolling out a V1.1, but they did change some things---I believe a couple of parts & how something was set up before leaving the factory. When I got mine back, it definitely performed much more smoothly. I'd say if you got a late batch or a current one you're fine.codetocontra wrote:Didn't the original Replicator have a bunch of noise and reliability issues? Did those get resolved with the later D'Luxe model? I am just a bit skeptical regarding this new Binson but a real spinning disc echo is pretty fucking cool. The only other company I would expect to do something remotely similar would be Gamechanger Audio, as I expect they must be working on a delay with some sort of gimmick and a spinning disc wouldn't be out of their jurisdiction.echorec wrote: One of the selling points of the Replicator was a unit that didn't need much maintenance and could easily be cleaned and maintained by someone with no knowledge of tape machines.
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
Your description of the tone differences reminds me of the Alexander Syntax Error. I love v1 and was excited for the new features on v2 but it didn't sound the same and it lost the vibe. The features didn't make up for it and were weirdly implemented.Tall Walls wrote:I've been learning the ways of the MOOD MKII for the past few days.
I think it's best to think of the MOOD MKII as a whole new pedal designed around the same concept as the original MOOD. My mistake was getting rid of my original. For me, the new features make the MKII worthwhile, even though there's no way to replicate the sound of the original.oldangelmidnight wrote:Your description of the tone differences reminds me of the Alexander Syntax Error. I love v1 and was excited for the new features on v2 but it didn't sound the same and it lost the vibe. The features didn't make up for it and were weirdly implemented.Tall Walls wrote:I've been learning the ways of the MOOD MKII for the past few days.
I'm also reminded of Generation Loss and how it would have been nice to be able to pick certain features from the classic mode but making it either/or was frustrating.
And the Dark World where there's volume drop on the Cooper side.
Have you tried Habit or Blooper and how do you feel about the stutter and drop effects in those? You can at least boost the volume there.
Too bad about those weird stereo choices.
D.o.S. wrote:Broadly speaking, if we at ILF are dropping 300 bucks on a pedal it probably sounds like an SNES holocaust.
friendship wrote:death to false bleep-blop
UglyCasanova wrote:brb gonna slap my dick on my stomp boxes
I watched a couple of videos and it does look significantly different from the MK1 Mood.Tall Walls wrote:I think it's best to think of the MOOD MKII as a whole new pedal designed around the same concept as the original MOOD. My mistake was getting rid of my original. For me, the new features make the MKII worthwhile, even though there's no way to replicate the sound of the original.oldangelmidnight wrote:Your description of the tone differences reminds me of the Alexander Syntax Error. I love v1 and was excited for the new features on v2 but it didn't sound the same and it lost the vibe. The features didn't make up for it and were weirdly implemented.Tall Walls wrote:I've been learning the ways of the MOOD MKII for the past few days.
I'm also reminded of Generation Loss and how it would have been nice to be able to pick certain features from the classic mode but making it either/or was frustrating.
And the Dark World where there's volume drop on the Cooper side.
Have you tried Habit or Blooper and how do you feel about the stutter and drop effects in those? You can at least boost the volume there.
Too bad about those weird stereo choices.
I think my volume issue with the Envelope mode is a side effect of the higher fidelity of the MKII. The original MOOD kind of fuzzed out your tone, while MKII is very clean. If I feed the MKII a distorted or fuzz tone I don't notice a volume issue. I have a Blooper; the Dropper modifier is my favorite, but it isn't really comparable to the MOOD's Envelope mode. And the Stutter modifier is okay but the slices are always too small for my taste, and it isn't triggered by dynamics like the MOOD's Envelope mode.
Tall Walls wrote:I think it's best to think of the MOOD MKII as a whole new pedal designed around the same concept as the original MOOD. My mistake was getting rid of my original. For me, the new features make the MKII worthwhile, even though there's no way to replicate the sound of the original.oldangelmidnight wrote:Your description of the tone differences reminds me of the Alexander Syntax Error. I love v1 and was excited for the new features on v2 but it didn't sound the same and it lost the vibe. The features didn't make up for it and were weirdly implemented.Tall Walls wrote:I've been learning the ways of the MOOD MKII for the past few days.
I'm also reminded of Generation Loss and how it would have been nice to be able to pick certain features from the classic mode but making it either/or was frustrating.
And the Dark World where there's volume drop on the Cooper side.
Have you tried Habit or Blooper and how do you feel about the stutter and drop effects in those? You can at least boost the volume there.
Too bad about those weird stereo choices.
I think my volume issue with the Envelope mode is a side effect of the higher fidelity of the MKII. The original MOOD kind of fuzzed out your tone, while MKII is very clean. If I feed the MKII a distorted or fuzz tone I don't notice a volume issue. I have a Blooper; the Dropper modifier is my favorite, but it isn't really comparable to the MOOD's Envelope mode. And the Stutter modifier is okay but the slices are always too small for my taste, and it isn't triggered by dynamics like the MOOD's Envelope mode.