ilovefuzz.com

Gearmond wrote:also fancied up flangers are literally the best. through zero, oscillating lfo, random square wave, airplane flange. all arguably some of the most transformative and expressive effects out there

BUY... http://www.ilovefuzz.com/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=28159&p=499526&hilit=bbe#p493919

I'm just poking a stick with the stereo thing - although it is true that I don't run stereo, I don't mind if fx are stereo enabled. That said there were some really valid things raised earlier in the thread before I dicked it up.

Mudfuzz wrote:

greigoroth wrote:How many of you space age stereo technology freaks using tube amps? HAH! Busted! You're luddites like me! ONE OF US, ONE OF US! Monophonic everything for the win!

ugnug

I don't wanna alarm any one... but I think Jimmie Webster is going to rape us... all of us.

Gearmond wrote:

theavondon wrote:Fwiw, the most boring flanger>the most interesting chorus

false: Sea Machine.



also fancied up flangers are literally the best. through zero, oscillating lfo, random square wave, airplane flange. all arguably some of the most transformative and expressive effects out there

I want more analog through-zero flangers out there. The fact that there's really only two in the world really annoys me. The fact that Moog made a flanger without making it through-zero REALLY disappointed me, they usually don't go halfway on their pedals.

I'm not an analog-snob either, I love digital effects. But I've tried most of the digital flangers and they just can't do the through-zero thing right. Although I still haven't tried the Strymon yet. I just haven't see a used one for sale for a decent price.

sonidero wrote:

Gearmond wrote:also fancied up flangers are literally the best. through zero, oscillating lfo, random square wave, airplane flange. all arguably some of the most transformative and expressive effects out there

BUY... http://www.ilovefuzz.com/viewtopic.php?f=44&t=28159&p=499526&hilit=bbe#p493919

i am how you say broke

bigchiefbc wrote:
I want more analog through-zero flangers out there. The fact that there's really only two in the world really annoys me. The fact that Moog made a flanger without making it through-zero REALLY disappointed me, they usually don't go halfway on their pedals.

I'm not an analog-snob either, I love digital effects. But I've tried most of the digital flangers and they just can't do the through-zero thing right. Although I still haven't tried the Strymon yet. I just haven't see a used one for sale for a decent price.

Used Mod Zeros aren't too uncommon, and Jack Deville/Mr. Black makes the Tunnelworm Flanger if you want something new?

People assuming that boutique is naturally better, even though I've heard some that sound absolutely woeful by comparison to their mass produced (and therefore less cool) 'equivalent'

onelouderash wrote:

bigchiefbc wrote:
I want more analog through-zero flangers out there. The fact that there's really only two in the world really annoys me. The fact that Moog made a flanger without making it through-zero REALLY disappointed me, they usually don't go halfway on their pedals.

I'm not an analog-snob either, I love digital effects. But I've tried most of the digital flangers and they just can't do the through-zero thing right. Although I still haven't tried the Strymon yet. I just haven't see a used one for sale for a decent price.

Used Mod Zeros aren't too uncommon, and Jack Deville/Mr. Black makes the Tunnelworm Flanger if you want something new?

I can't find a single clip of someone playing the Mod Zero where they actually do any through-zero flanging. Maybe every single person who demo'd it doesn't know how to use it, but I'm skeptical until I can hear it do that cancellation "slurp" at the zero point.

Now, the Tunnelworm sounds like it can really do it. I was only able to find that one prototype clip, but I can't wait to check it out.

The Dano reverse delay's crazy price trips me out. Why are people buying that shit for $200-300 instead of ANY other delay that does reverse and more?

because everyone wants a dedicated reverse delay?

bigchiefbc wrote:

onelouderash wrote:

bigchiefbc wrote:
I want more analog through-zero flangers out there. The fact that there's really only two in the world really annoys me. The fact that Moog made a flanger without making it through-zero REALLY disappointed me, they usually don't go halfway on their pedals.

I'm not an analog-snob either, I love digital effects. But I've tried most of the digital flangers and they just can't do the through-zero thing right. Although I still haven't tried the Strymon yet. I just haven't see a used one for sale for a decent price.

Used Mod Zeros aren't too uncommon, and Jack Deville/Mr. Black makes the Tunnelworm Flanger if you want something new?

I can't find a single clip of someone playing the Mod Zero where they actually do any through-zero flanging. Maybe every single person who demo'd it doesn't know how to use it, but I'm skeptical until I can hear it do that cancellation "slurp" at the zero point.

Now, the Tunnelworm sounds like it can really do it. I was only able to find that one prototype clip, but I can't wait to check it out.

I'm blasted on post-surgery narcotics... what's through zero mean?

oh, I KNOW ONE TREND

THE SHORTAGE OF SONIC CRAYON PEDALS

I WANT ANTI-NAUTILUS NAO

D.o.S. wrote:

bigchiefbc wrote:

onelouderash wrote:

bigchiefbc wrote:
I want more analog through-zero flangers out there. The fact that there's really only two in the world really annoys me. The fact that Moog made a flanger without making it through-zero REALLY disappointed me, they usually don't go halfway on their pedals.

I'm not an analog-snob either, I love digital effects. But I've tried most of the digital flangers and they just can't do the through-zero thing right. Although I still haven't tried the Strymon yet. I just haven't see a used one for sale for a decent price.

Used Mod Zeros aren't too uncommon, and Jack Deville/Mr. Black makes the Tunnelworm Flanger if you want something new?

I can't find a single clip of someone playing the Mod Zero where they actually do any through-zero flanging. Maybe every single person who demo'd it doesn't know how to use it, but I'm skeptical until I can hear it do that cancellation "slurp" at the zero point.

Now, the Tunnelworm sounds like it can really do it. I was only able to find that one prototype clip, but I can't wait to check it out.

I'm blasted on post-surgery narcotics... what's through zero mean?

It's difficult to explain, I'll type it up later.

::EDIT:: -> viewtopic.php?f=149&t=21359&start=45#p337220

Here is an earlier post when I explained it.

what i want to see disappear for awhile:

shimmer verb
oscillating fuzz
envelope filters with twenty knobs
clean boosts
re-rubs of Tone Benders that cost $300
loopers with only 20 or 30 seconds of loop time

Achtane wrote:The Dano reverse delay's crazy price trips me out. Why are people buying that shit for $200-300 instead of ANY other delay that does reverse and more?

Cause it sounds really really good, like amazingly what the fuck good...
Also to get a delay with reverse and others you kinda have to get a delay that does like EVERYTHING, superdelay etc or the reverse delay is super half assed, won't go full wet without modding. It's like the one unique good danelectro pedal but I don't get why the wasabi isn't the one people want cause it totally has the same reverse but with tap tempo which people seem to like for some reason.