Re: Count To Five
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2016 11:57 am
What pot ohm does the CT5 like best?
blakestree wrote:What pot ohm does the CT5 like best?
blakestree wrote:But, you can get full range from a 10k?
ogguitar wrote:Anyone using one of these for expression?
http://this1smyne.com/shop/me-mini-expression-pedal/
multi_s wrote:i have no idea what is most common.
if you buy one and want to use it with ct5 make sure you get what they are calling "stereo" with the TRS jack. otherwise no love.
also i am just finishing testing a small firmware update for the rev k's that went out which fixes the mode 2 transcendence issue (shrinking buffer), adds level control to mode 3 (can turn down each DIR independently) and also attempts to resolve something someone i think not from this board was able to demonstrate, which is in mode 3 the write head is not quite perfectly aligned with DIR 1 when at 1:1 forward and recording so if you try to use it as a "normal" looper to layer there is a slight doubling effect. i don't quite have the fingers that guy did but we have tried to theoretically improve this latency, so hopefully it works out.
if these are solid fixes we will release the parallel firmwares for h,i,j. so a bit of a detour on that.
if you have found any other bugs right with the rev k release now would be the best time to let me know. not a wish list, just problems vs what it was advertised to do plz.
s
pd~ wrote:When the h/i/j update hits, will there be any significant difference between them and k? Got a j coming from a trade.
multi_s wrote:i have no idea what is most common.
if you buy one and want to use it with ct5 make sure you get what they are calling "stereo" with the TRS jack. otherwise no love.
also i am just finishing testing a small firmware update for the rev k's that went out which fixes the mode 2 transcendence issue (shrinking buffer), adds level control to mode 3 (can turn down each DIR independently) and also attempts to resolve something someone i think not from this board was able to demonstrate, which is in mode 3 the write head is not quite perfectly aligned with DIR 1 when at 1:1 forward and recording so if you try to use it as a "normal" looper to layer there is a slight doubling effect. i don't quite have the fingers that guy did but we have tried to theoretically improve this latency, so hopefully it works out.
if these are solid fixes we will release the parallel firmwares for h,i,j. so a bit of a detour on that.
if you have found any other bugs right with the rev k release now would be the best time to let me know. not a wish list, just problems vs what it was advertised to do plz.
s
Cortex wrote:Fantastic to hear about the new firmware update that will give us volume control in mode 3! Thank you so much!!
Will the set volumes for different DIRs be remembered on mode change or even pedal power off? Both would be useful I think. I could see myself setting one set of volumes to use in 90% of situations and then rest of the time(I would probably tinker with it, but rarely.
Either way, fantastic that you're doing this.
multi_s wrote:Cortex wrote:Fantastic to hear about the new firmware update that will give us volume control in mode 3! Thank you so much!!
Will the set volumes for different DIRs be remembered on mode change or even pedal power off? Both would be useful I think. I could see myself setting one set of volumes to use in 90% of situations and then rest of the time(I would probably tinker with it, but rarely.
Either way, fantastic that you're doing this.
when you flip modes it will keep the volume setting in mode 3 if you leave and come back. for power off/on i will add something so that you can save the power on default. this will save transcendence and q mode as well. so basically you set the pedal the way you want the default to be, store it, then if you change things, when you power cycle it will go back to the state you stored.
s