ilovefuzz.com

nogodsnobedtimes wrote:

repoman wrote:Both MacCready and Childs were Things in the end.
If either of them were human, and they knew they would freeze to death, they would not take the chance that the other was possibly the Thing, so on seeing each other both would have tried to kill each other. But since they did not, both were Things.

Truth.

Deckard is a replicant too.

Sonaboy wrote:

nogodsnobedtimes wrote:

repoman wrote:Both MacCready and Childs were Things in the end.
If either of them were human, and they knew they would freeze to death, they would not take the chance that the other was possibly the Thing, so on seeing each other both would have tried to kill each other. But since they did not, both were Things.

Truth.

Deckard is a replicant too.

NEWWWWWP.

popvulture wrote:If you look closely, you might see that despite all my rage I am much more than just a rat in a cage.

morange wrote:Yeah that's true. I heard there will be a LOTR series on amazon, I guess we'll see how that goes. I hope we get some of the weird stuff left out of the movies, like Tom Bombadil and the barrow wights.

friendship wrote:

morange wrote:Yeah that's true. I heard there will be a LOTR series on amazon, I guess we'll see how that goes. I hope we get some of the weird stuff left out of the movies, like Tom Bombadil and the barrow wights.

Controversial Opinion: I think there should be a Tom Bombadil spinoff series

You're nothing but a body in your mind

nogodsnobedtimes wrote:

Sonaboy wrote:

nogodsnobedtimes wrote:

repoman wrote:Both MacCready and Childs were Things in the end.
If either of them were human, and they knew they would freeze to death, they would not take the chance that the other was possibly the Thing, so on seeing each other both would have tried to kill each other. But since they did not, both were Things.

Truth.

Deckard is a replicant too.

NEWWWWWP.

YUUUUUUUP.