Thanks!adamajah wrote:Tasty @Seance!

adamajah wrote:
I need to go stutter my Stamme[n] now ...

Moderator: drolo
Thanks!adamajah wrote:Tasty @Seance!
adamajah wrote:
I need to go stutter my Stamme[n] now ...
I love it when things put together seemingly randomly suddenly work as if they were planned to be that waySeance wrote:Stomping in a Puddle of Pedals parts 5 and 6 feature a healthy dose of Stamme[n]:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzUNJQRBNUY[/youtube]
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6xz29aXAS0[/youtube]
I've also been using the Stamme[n] to work on the soundtracks for two of my abstract animated films.
For several weeks now I've been stuck... feeling like both soundtracks are just okay and that something
was missing. I wasn't sure what to add or to take away and so I felt deadlocked in creative-block paralysis.
Then today I had the idea of switching the soundtracks between the two and now they now both actually
work a lot better. With a few tweaks I might be done and ready to move on to my next project.
Which is strange since I recorded the first pass of soundtrack while watching the animation... turns out
the textures and movements and structures all fit better with the other, not the intended animation.
Oh well. Weird.
Yes! Synchronicity is sublime.drolo wrote: I love it when things put together seemingly randomly suddenly work as if they were planned to be that way
I have been learning a bit more about John Cage lately and it got me interested in his chance operations. Need to read up on that some more
Also can be fun to sloooow down a clip (reversed or not). New textures emerge.Paul_C wrote: The other thing I particularly like doing is reversing bits, as something that sounds "ok" can sound much better when reversed.
Thanks! Fuzz input equals epic output!drolo wrote:intense and epic !
My wife got those for her sewing machine but then found out thatdrolo wrote:intense and epic !
Like your little lights too
NiiceSeance wrote:I love fuzz (and the Filter Hold on the Stamme[n]).
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M_UCwYh5ZlM[/youtube]
Oh no, I love the expression function. Big selling point to me. There's one or two modes I don't use. The filter for one but that's because I have other options and a Molecular Disruptor <g>.drolo wrote:I am slowly getting the itch to update the stamme[n] and I'm struggling with some decisions. I'd like to add some new stuff but would need to make room for that.
So before I start tossing coins and make random choices I thought I'd ask you guys
(sorry in advance, the questions may not make sense outside of my brain)
- How important is the tap tempo function, especially if that function could be replaced with a reverse loop function?
- Would you give up the possibility to expression control the filter and pitch settings, have these controls as separate manual controls and make room for 2 new modes?
- What are your favorite and least favorite modes?
- Any other thoughts?
UglyCasanova wrote:I don't use the exp control. I mainly use tap tempo glitch, FL and ST. Basically, the exact opposite of shikawkee.