dandy13 wrote:Got mine: fun pedal! Like ghost hip was saying, it was suprisingly easy to dial some good sounds straight away but I feel like I've barely scratched the surface
How'd you get that killer blacked out one?
Also, his name is fucking Pumpkin Pieces! Fuck you Jared!! You don't own my mind!!!
Re: EQD Data Corrupter
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2017 2:20 am
by Iommic Pope
Yeah that is sexy.
Re: EQD Data Corrupter
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 6:39 am
by dandy13
Jesus Was a Robot wrote:
How'd you get that killer blacked out one?
Also, his name is fucking Pumpkin Pieces! Fuck you Jared!! You don't own my mind!!!
EQD has been doing launch parties locally for their last few releases and they will usually have some custom color options. I’ve got a pretty cool looking blue transmisser too.
Re: EQD Data Corrupter
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 3:18 pm
by goroth
I would have been all over this 4 years ago.
Now I'm too jaded on PLL things to work out if I actually have gas for this or not.
But maybe it's cool? I think?
Re: EQD Data Corrupter
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 4:36 pm
by Ghost Hip
goroth wrote:I would have been all over this 4 years ago.
Now I'm too jaded on PLL things to work out if I actually have gas for this or not.
But maybe it's cool? I think?
I honestly never grasped what a PLL did until this came out. Thats partially because I never bothered to check into it more. I wrote it off as "its a fuzzy pitch video game sound thing." Most of the first demonstrations I listened to of the Schumann way back when didn't really make it come across as musical. It just seems weird for the sake of weird. When I heard the data corrupter demos I instantly was like "bruh I could cop those squealy pitch shifted James Iha toans with this." As a huge smashing pumpkins nerd this pedal is like a giant shortcut to all their octave fuzz tones. (that reminds me i need to buy an ebow) Anyways what I wanted to say is I think the reason this pedal has people on the PLL bandwagon is presentation and its easy to use interface.
Also the music theorist in me wants to know why a Major 2nd sub 3 octaves down sounds better than just 3 octaves down.
Re: EQD Data Corrupter
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 6:44 pm
by doommeow
I need to go back and reread the whole thread, but - has anyone done any side by sides with this and the 4096-M? I've never bonded with mine and this seems alot more controllable...
Re: EQD Data Corrupter
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2017 9:47 pm
by MrNovember
doommeow wrote:I need to go back and reread the whole thread, but - has anyone done any side by sides with this and the 4096-M? I've never bonded with mine and this seems alot more controllable...
This interests me as well. I love my 4046-m and everything Industrialectric does, but sometimes, I just can't get the 4046 to do what I want or what I am imagining. It seems like this one might be a lot more immediate
Re: EQD Data Corrupter
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2018 10:22 pm
by retinal orbita
I splurged on a used one on Reverb and it arrived today - played for 15 minutes before I had to duck out and I looooooooooooove it on bass already.
I don’t care about laser gun sounds but as a subby synth and a crazy square wave fuzz I was able to dial in the sickest sounds on my bass immediately. So many more options I’m sure lurking within.
Only complaint is I won’t be able to fucking rip on this on anything other than a small combo while my neighbours are home for a while. I’d love to fuck with this through a bunch of 15s and get them trousers flappin’. A+ pedal, will fuck with for 1000 years.
Re: EQD Data Corrupter
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2018 10:50 pm
by Chankgeez
This Justin Pearson vid (plays his PLL at the beginning) is pertinent to this thread:
[youtube][/youtube]
Re: EQD Data Corrupter
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2018 10:57 pm
by retinal orbita
I haven’t fucked with The Locust in 20 years and I’m pleasantly surprised at how well they have matured - I saw them in 1997 or 1998 and it was pretty ripping but I sort of fell out of that sort of stuff but I’ve been jamming them a good bit lately based on the PLL love I’ve been feeling
Re: EQD Data Corrupter
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 9:34 am
by odontophobia
retinal orbita wrote:I haven’t fucked with The Locust in 20 years and I’m pleasantly surprised at how well they have matured - I saw them in 1997 or 1998 and it was pretty ripping but I sort of fell out of that sort of stuff but I’ve been jamming them a good bit lately based on the PLL love I’ve been feeling
It makes sense but I just assumed it was all the synths doing the spacey glitchy octave sounds on a safety second body last. Back then I had no idea what a PLL was so I would’ve never guess. Damn it sounds awesome on that record.
Also, as far as 4096-m comparisons: the Data Corrupter is much, much more controllable. I never bonded with my 4096-m and could never really get it to do what I wanted. It was surprisingly easy to dial in some tones with the Data Corrupter
Re: EQD Data Corrupter
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 8:56 pm
by Jero
Don't remind me of my poor decisions (selling my Data Corrupter)
Re: EQD Data Corrupter
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 9:09 pm
by adamajah
MrNovember wrote:I just got a Data Corrupter a few days ago. Plugged it in to test it out and immediately fell in love with it on bass: https://www.instagram.com/p/Bsq_MuWBCz4/
Also, as far as 4096-m comparisons: the Data Corrupter is much, much more controllable. I never bonded with my 4096-m and could never really get it to do what I wanted. It was surprisingly easy to dial in some tones with the Data Corrupter
Damn. That actually sounds really sweet.
Re: EQD Data Corrupter
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2019 9:43 pm
by manymanyhaha
Indeed it does. As impressed as I was initially by the Moutarde demo, I like the sound of that better. Love the harmony underneath and around.