Re: Where do we stand on Billy Corgan? //hivemind
Posted: Tue May 03, 2016 11:28 pm
Another thing that should be noted is that he is (well, was) not only a great musician, but also a master of aesthetic.
You watch the videos for "Tonight, Tonight" and "Stand Inside Your Love," and they feel timeless, I think. Which is absurd because they're so pathetically tied to the time in which they came out. But they really have a definite aesthetic that works with the band and the music. Like... to get the look of "Tonight, Tonight" they used actual 1920s cameras. That stuff is fucking important. It does not go unappreciated. Like... you hold a copy of Mellon Collie in your hands and you know it's something. It just fucking looks like something.
Very similar to Kurt Cobain in that regard. Nirvana isn't just a band, it's a whole big mess of crap that includes a band, but also includes anatomy dolls with wings, puppy-dog eyes, smashed offset Fenders, naked babies in swimming pools, scarecrows, gender fluidity, Iron Maiden t-shirts, etc., etc.
You watch the videos for "Tonight, Tonight" and "Stand Inside Your Love," and they feel timeless, I think. Which is absurd because they're so pathetically tied to the time in which they came out. But they really have a definite aesthetic that works with the band and the music. Like... to get the look of "Tonight, Tonight" they used actual 1920s cameras. That stuff is fucking important. It does not go unappreciated. Like... you hold a copy of Mellon Collie in your hands and you know it's something. It just fucking looks like something.
Very similar to Kurt Cobain in that regard. Nirvana isn't just a band, it's a whole big mess of crap that includes a band, but also includes anatomy dolls with wings, puppy-dog eyes, smashed offset Fenders, naked babies in swimming pools, scarecrows, gender fluidity, Iron Maiden t-shirts, etc., etc.