ilovefuzz.com

There are a lot of things I could do without in a partner, but a face is not one of them.

Duck yeah, fish are hawt! Fish have faces, Aen. Don't be a speciesist.

aen wrote:There are a lot of things I could do without in a partner, but a face is not one of them.

Bruh. Fish still have faces, they just don't look like a human face. LOL. Just put a bag on it right???

Imagine how cute the babies would be. All fish and Aen mixed. hahahaha

Aen top or bottom?

Why aren't we considering left/right splits?

Also,

Pitiful attempt to add variation on the "tits or ass" question.

tits.

whiney wrote:

I was just thinking about you comsect, remembering your uhhh let's say slightly regressive lame-out flame-out... wondering if you were lurking like a ghost after ghosting like a jerk... and here you are, posting in the fish porn thread like you never left, of course you are.

Were ya wondering why nobody wanted to talk about it much, wondering about that uncomfortable silence after you left? Did you miss us? Did you wonder if we missed you?

I wonder where you're dumping your word hoard these days, where does it have to go?

If you were thinking of me that much, I feel sorry for you. But you just fall into the 99.8 % of typical "musician" boy types anyway which makes me laugh

Oh god, this fucking thread.

Invisible Man wrote:Why aren't we considering left/right splits?

Not allowed!

Wittgenstein wrote:Pitiful attempt to add variation on the "tits or ass" question.

tits.

I mean, this isn't really the question at hand to me. It's more would you want a fully functioning body versus a non function one.

With a fish top, you still get the mouth and who's to say those scales can't get some implants? Right??

With the fish bottom, you loose the butt and the vagina. So you cannot do kinky stuff or have kids. Which I would assume you'd want to. hah

jwar wrote:
With the fish bottom... you cannot do kinky stuff ...

Manifestly false.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U_Aeo4T65Jg[/youtube]

comeseccxxxfiend2.0 wrote:If you were thinking of me that much, I feel sorry for you. But you just fall into the 99.8 % of typical "musician" boy types anyway which makes me laugh

Aww...

It's not that I was thinking about you so much... just happened to wonder about you, and there your post was. You put the chronic in my synchronicity.

I'm teasing... kind of. And maybe I was a little mean, but there was some heart in it too. I think I actually appreciate and get you more than most, which makes me less than typical. “Typical” made me laugh though. I’m an oddball 3.0 – we might even worship the same moon. Trickster is as trickster does.

You doubled down and flamed out a bit. I thought you were showing some spots of closemindedness not in keeping with your uhm… expanded perspectives… a hint of the "typical" bro type perhaps? (with your own unique spin of course… bro 2.0?)

Everybody wants to be “well… that was awkward… ahem… moving on…” but I’d rather poke it with a stick I guess

So yeah, calling out, calling in… miss you, but only your better parts

...thanks brother...no more confusion..texting/typing disembodied bs...no ill will...its just b.s. fun...gonna stick to gear only from now on...no jokes. kissy.

jwar wrote:

Wittgenstein wrote:Pitiful attempt to add variation on the "tits or ass" question.

tits.

I mean, this isn't really the question at hand to me. It's more would you want a fully functioning body versus a non function one.

With a fish top, you still get the mouth and who's to say those scales can't get some implants? Right??

With the fish bottom, you loose the butt and the vagina. So you cannot do kinky stuff or have kids. Which I would assume you'd want to. hah

jwar fighting the good fight.

FISH TOP MASTER RACE!

comesect2.0 wrote:...thanks brother...no more confusion..texting/typing disembodied bs...no ill will...its just b.s. fun...gonna stick to gear only from now on...no jokes. kissy.