Page 69 of 138
Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 1:03 pm
by lordgalvar
ck3 wrote:A Pigtronix Ringmaster arrived earlier today. I had an hour or so to do some tinkering with it placed in my amp's effects loop. Per the usual protocol, I did so without reading a manual and was eventually able to deduce how the knobs and switches interact. So far, it seems muffled, overly clippy, and and meh aside from hypnotic glitchiness and synth-like textures possible when engaging the intelligent, LFO, and sample hold ring modulation modes. The tremolo seems pretty weak and unwieldy compared to other options on hand, but may just need to be tweaked better. There is also the distinct possibility the pedal may sound better in front of my amp, though I can already tell that the included power supply will generate a noticeable amount of unwanted noise. More experimentation is in order before rendering a final verdict.
Just to get this out of the way: I don't really blend ring mods...it's almost always full wet...so most things I say are from that base point.
Yeah, that's kinda what I was getting at with the mixer on the pedal...it's kind of hard to dial in. I had it set well when just plugging strait in, then put a fuzz in front and I ran out of time trying to find a gain sweet spot. I think it clips too much with the gain so that it can square it off for the tracking stuff. It's four controls if I remember correctly (kinda), which is kind of a pain...you have to match the volume of the sine carrier to the source audio.
Because the carrier is a sweepable sine-square with harmonic distortion, it is possible it can kind of cancel/saturate/sound weird with overly distorted signals going in (like overdriving the front end gain). The harmonics get kinda fiddly and can interfere with the perception and output signal in the final blend...which is why I can be kind of trying to adjust one parameter and then readjust everything for balance. The more harmonic or loud one signal is in relation to the other, can really change the result. It's part of the reason a lot of ring mods stay with simpler, less harmonic waves.
The tremolo has been great to me. I like it better than Randy and the Moog, but not as much as the noah'sark. The high end frequencies aren't my favorite (much prefer a ton of others), but they are functional (don't dig them as much tracking...because that's not what I'm doing haha). I kind of like the tracking on the subdecay for high pitched stuff better too...it adds some fun wobbles and stuff.
I think your effects loop is probably too hot. Did you try a volume pedal before? (Other ideas that may help tame it it an effects loop or after gain: static bandpass filter, eq, limiter)
Overall, I like the pedal. I like having the dynamic tremolo and it's fun. It's just really touchy.
Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 1:57 pm
by Dandolin

looking forward to trying this one....
Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:01 pm
by Chankgeez
lordgalvar wrote: I like it better than Randy and the Moog...
Two of the best ring mod/trems right there.

Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:04 pm
by ck3
Many thanks to betteroffshred and lordgalvar for suggestions regarding how to get better results with the Pigtronix Ringmaster.
It definitely seems more like a front-of-amp pedal, though, as I feared, the included power supply is crap and generates excessive buzzing when my amp's gain channel is engaged. Also, there is always crackly clipping present regardless of the source and input/output settings, which is tolerable with ring modulation, but makes the tremolo unusable. Everything else in the amp input signal chain is true bypass, and I'm using a Triplite isolated 8 outlet power strip and isolated power bricks or batteries for other pedals. I wonder if the unit I recieved is defective, or maybe certain settings need to be balanced better.
Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 4:20 pm
by lordgalvar
Chankgeez wrote:lordgalvar wrote: I like it better than Randy and the Moog...
Two of the best ring mod/trems right there.

I won't say it's because of the sound...it just accomplishes something I've always wanted...trem speed controlled by playing by not by envelope (have a could of those and I like them).
Still think there are better sound ring mods overall, I just like that feature. The Moog, RMA, old LAL, old EHX, and Randy (among others) are better overall to me (was only in reference to slow speeds). The noah'sark has something magic though.
Ck3 power supply anecdotes
I can tell ya after chasing various noise problems...the power adapter thing is a crap shoot. With my eurorack, I supposedly had "high" quality ones...but they were noisy until I switched them with the ones everyone said was bad...nothing would tune, noise was higher than actual waves, etc. I've also had some issues mixing wall warts with isolated supplies and sometimes not. I think it more has to do with the power in the building and grid (you can tell in LA when it gets hot because noise floor rises...the voltage dropped).
Chankgeez had a whole thread about chasing noise issues in his place.
I have to find a circuit with nothing on it for best results (no appliances, computers, etc) and sometimes try it with a lamp on or off (sometimes a lamp will cut the noise if on!). Also, no more than 4 pedals (even if true bypass) here due to noise buildup/treble loss...usually just run fuzz/dist and ring mod...maybe some time based something. I have a humx thing that worked on a few things, but overall it's just a low risk, low probability saving throw. My pedals have liked the voodoo labs or cioks pretty well...not so much the old pedal power one that came built into the board.
My old studio was even worse! I would get oscillations in my amp from a keyboard across the room haha.
The crackle...I dunno. I haven't noticed anything here. Try it alone and if it persists, send it back defective.
I just ran in there and played it...I think sometimes the pop is the lfo taking dominance of the signal. The distortion on the carrier is pretty neat/weird sometimes because it can kinda sit under the signal with the clean chirp of the guitar catching the ear more over the top. I did replicate some popping though and my guess is that the carrier on square is changing too fast and kind of moving the speaker from one state to another (I remember reading years ago that some synth designers made their squares slight trapezoids to prevent the popping sound). The crackle could also be the gain on the carrier...or it could be broke.

Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:28 pm
by alexsga
eyobeez wrote:Today's my day off for the week, and I'm like this close to ordering a Subdecay Vitruvian Mod.
pm me i'll sell you a used one
Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 9:59 pm
by ck3
The Vitruvian Mod is a solid option and quieter than many of its analog counterparts.
I fed the Ringmaster directly into my amp's front end with no other gear, and still have loads of crusty treble clipping when using the tremolo mode regardless of pedal and guitar settings. Major bummer, especially given the complex rhythms possible by tweaking LFO and tune parameters.
Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 10:24 pm
by eyobeez
alexsga wrote:eyobeez wrote:Today's my day off for the week, and I'm like this close to ordering a Subdecay Vitruvian Mod.
pm me i'll sell you a used one
What version do you have?
Can it clang with the best of em?
Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses
Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2018 11:08 pm
by alexsga
eyobeez wrote:alexsga wrote:eyobeez wrote:Today's my day off for the week, and I'm like this close to ordering a Subdecay Vitruvian Mod.
pm me i'll sell you a used one
What version do you have?
Can it clang with the best of em?
v2
yes! but it also has FM-style tracking capabilities

Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2018 7:02 am
by eyobeez
Fuck. If I were you, I'd expect a message from me this afternoon.
Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2018 12:56 pm
by alexsga
Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses
Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2018 9:33 pm
by ck3
Based on demo vids, it seems the Ringmaster is actually behaving normally. I suppose expecting a clean tremolo sound from a ring modulator is kind of like wanting a Big Muff to chime like a Klon. Either way, the more fuzzy/square trem tones are fantastic and its inherent synthiness ultimately makes it a keeper, though I'll need to find a quieter power supply.
Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2018 1:41 am
by BetterOffShred
I ordered a NE565A .. so I can build an Anderton Ring mod with effects loop... they are pretty jam. Seen a few in this thread.. one here recently
Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2018 10:00 pm
by ck3
It turns out the Ringmaster seems to function normally when powered by the 18V 100ma port on my One Spot CS7. I'm surprised given the current draw is 180ma (per the Pigtronix website), but definitely stoked now that noisy power is no longer an issue.
Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 7:32 am
by eyobeez
Glad it's working for you, ck. The ringmaster seems like a sweet ped.
My vitruvian is on the way from alexsga
