AdamHalogen wrote:Im getting a lot of noise when my CT5 is engaged, anyone else have this issue?
making recording very difficult.
please feel free to email me directly if you have any issues with the pedal mtl.asm@gmail.com, i'm sure we can work it out.
PaulB wrote:Thanks vidret. yeah I'm still exploring the ct5.
Hey Scott, the quantize feature of the ct5 brought me to an idea for a new pedal. you gotta make an arpeggiator and these are some of the features:
- a great variety of skales, not just major/minor.
-of course they can be playbacked from very slow to very fast, forward and backwards.
-and you can go through the skales with an expressionpedal for handsfree operation.
-but heres my main feature: the eqd arpanoid sounds cool but the arpeggios are a bit "stiff" to me. They're alway in time (which isn't a bad thing, of course). But I think you're able to built an out-of-time parameter. Imagine the notes of a scale as dancers in a country line dancing group (or something similar) and of course some of them are bit out of time so they are one or two steps early or behind. That would produce a loose and lively feel on the arpeggio. And by adjusting the parameter from slightly out of step (beginner-mode) to totally out of step (drunk-mode) you can conduct the little group for fun. Of course one could determine via toggle switch or expressionpedal which dancer(s) are out of time. "Hey, the fifth and major 3rd in the front row are bit behind!" Scott, you can do that! (I don't know if you did that already)
ya those are good ideas. I have stared to work a bit with another fellow who studied music tech and we have talked a lot in this vein, devices that focus more on live/on the fly composition by using more complex pattern generation than is typically available. I should wrap up the ct5s this week or early next, but I'm not sure when we will have any other devices done/avail, hopefully by the end of the summer.