Ben79 wrote:
Is it possible to reissue a prototype? If it was a prototype, it was never issued in the first place.
This.
Why call it a reissue if it really isn't?
Moderator: Ghost Hip
Ben79 wrote:
Is it possible to reissue a prototype? If it was a prototype, it was never issued in the first place.
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
Ben79 wrote:If it contains 4 470k resistors like Dr. Satan said, then it's gotta be a Fuzzrite.....hasn't it?
Is it possible to reissue a prototype? If it was a prototype, it was never issued in the first place.
Chankgeez wrote:Ben79 wrote:
Is it possible to reissue a prototype? If it was a prototype, it was never issued in the first place.
This.
Why call it a reissue if it really isn't?
Ben79 wrote:Yeah ok, it's a reissue in as much as the original company has released a fuzz pedal under the same name. So to the general fuzz buying masses, it's a WEM Pep Box, but to the guys here, who build fuzzes and who are interested in recreating lost sounds, I think the proof lies in the circuit and the components, which is yet to emerge. Plus it sounds totally different to Ian's.
Ben79 wrote:That's a silicon fuzzrite with polarity protection and power filtering. I built one on tag the other day.
Looks like there is a collector>base filter cap added to Q1 in the build, however.
Ben79 wrote:Interesting theory. I agree - it needs exploring. Could cast a big rock into the the pond of fuzz box history if it turns out to be true!