More Important: Nirvana or Fugazi?

Zounds Perspex · Post by **Zounds Perspex** » Sat Dec 03, 2011 8:33 am

I like some Nirvana songs.

You dudes will want to punch me, but the MUSIC of Fugazi is ridiculously overrated. I find it...pretty dull.

I would gladly will all of Nirvana's and Fugazi's music out of existence for one more D. Boon album.

Adoom · Post by **Adoom** » Sat Dec 03, 2011 8:52 am

No desire for violence, but I would say that 'Argument' would be a point to contend with, should you find them dull.

And jesus I miss the Minutemen.

I listen to a lot of Mike Watt though. I really fucking love Mike Watt. He seems like the nicest human being.

Toonster · Post by **Toonster** » Sat Dec 03, 2011 3:28 pm

Japan or Tibet?

veteransdaypoppy · Post by **veteransdaypoppy** » Sat Dec 03, 2011 4:08 pm

I find Fugazi's recorded music to be almost as boring as Nirvana's live performances (with the exception of Unplugged.) But Fugazi's live shit is almost as good as Nirvana's recorded music. Weird.

snipelfritz · Post by **snipelfritz** » Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:30 pm

I don't think we ever figured out what "Important" means.

bigchiefbc · Post by **bigchiefbc** » Sat Dec 03, 2011 7:07 pm

I never really liked Nirvana's "pop" stuff all that much, but I totally loved their more dissonant and aggressive shit. That being said, it wouldn't have been as interesting if there wasn't that dichotomy between the two styles. I like the fact that their albums would have some really saccharine poppy shit, and then they would just throw this ugly dissonant track at you to fuck with their fans' heads. Bands that are all just aggressive, dissonant hardcore punk are much less interesting to me. As for Fugazi, I don't feel qualified to have an opinion of them, as I've only really listen to bits and pieces.

Chumley · Post by **Chumley** » Sat Dec 03, 2011 7:09 pm

Toonster wrote:Japan or Tibet?

Tibet. Honestly Japan can lick my bum. :idk:

theavondon · Post by **theavondon** » Sat Dec 03, 2011 7:14 pm

I really like this thread, and the discussion therein.

kbit · Post by **kbit** » Sat Dec 03, 2011 8:43 pm

I've never really listened either band that much, but I love this video.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=apuLs_ayKRM[/youtube]

I am probably going to listen to more live material from Fugazi & Bleach later.

Fuzzy Fred · Post by **Fuzzy Fred** » Sat Dec 03, 2011 10:49 pm

theavondon wrote:I really like this thread, and the discussion therein.

D.o.S. · Post by **D.o.S.** » Sat Dec 03, 2011 11:02 pm

That's all I've got to say about that.

Also, We Jam Econo is on youtube in full. Definitely a great way to kill an hour or two.

Z*Z*Z · Post by **Z*Z*Z** » Sun Dec 04, 2011 12:03 am

Velvet Underground.

The4455 · Post by **The4455** » Sun Dec 04, 2011 1:12 am

This thread should have a poll, nirvana, fugazi, or other. GO!

Gearmond · Post by **Gearmond** » Sun Dec 04, 2011 1:27 am

Fugazi easily.

if i were to make a comparison.

Nirvana is Zepplin, and Fugazi is The Who. Zep was more popular, but The Who had WAY more influence

theavondon · Post by **theavondon** » Sun Dec 04, 2011 3:31 am

I like the Who more than Zep, that's for sure.

ilovefuzz.com

More Important: Nirvana or Fugazi?

Re: More Important: Nirvana or Fugazi?

Re: More Important: Nirvana or Fugazi?

Re: More Important: Nirvana or Fugazi?

Re: More Important: Nirvana or Fugazi?

Re: More Important: Nirvana or Fugazi?

Re: More Important: Nirvana or Fugazi?

Re: More Important: Nirvana or Fugazi?

Re: More Important: Nirvana or Fugazi?

Re: More Important: Nirvana or Fugazi?

Re: More Important: Nirvana or Fugazi?

Re: More Important: Nirvana or Fugazi?

Re: More Important: Nirvana or Fugazi?

Re: More Important: Nirvana or Fugazi?

Re: More Important: Nirvana or Fugazi?

Re: More Important: Nirvana or Fugazi?