Question for the Ages

Fuzzy Picklez · Post by **Fuzzy Picklez** » Tue Jan 25, 2011 4:30 am

bob the r0bot wrote:
Achtane wrote:More frets = more jangle

all hail the king of the jangles

Hail to the king baby.

Gearmond · Post by **Gearmond** » Tue Jan 25, 2011 8:48 pm

im sorry, but Conklin just wins any "most frets" competition.

magiclawnchair · Post by **magiclawnchair** » Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:34 pm

tony iommi wanted gibson to build him a 24 fret sg in the seventies and they would not. :mope:

if i have a 24th fret at some point i will hit it at the high e and it will be good! if i dont, and i usually dont, no big deal. :idk:

Jero · Post by **Jero** » Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:55 pm

Gearmond wrote:i can get 24 frets for like 70 bucks though...

but can you get a rick for $70? :hobbes:

tuffteef · Post by **tuffteef** » Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:58 pm

Jero wrote:
Gearmond wrote:i can get 24 frets for like 70 bucks though...

but can you get a rick for $70?

u give the rest in SEX

devnulljp · Post by **devnulljp** » Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:43 pm

Gearmond wrote:
randel_07 wrote:for fun.
and justification for the price they charge

i can get 24 frets for like 70 bucks though...

It's important they go on a piece of wood though.

elbandito · Post by **elbandito** » Wed Jan 26, 2011 3:22 pm

They don't. This is a '69 Rickenbacker...

Gearmond · Post by **Gearmond** » Wed Jan 26, 2011 5:11 pm

elbandito wrote:They don't. This is a '69 Rickenbacker...

its a 600, not a 300. no one cares about 600 ricks :P

ilovefuzz.com