General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.
Moderator: Ghost Hip
Fuzzy Picklez
IAMILF
Posts: 2196 Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2010 1:49 am
Location: Onterrible
Post
by Fuzzy Picklez » Sun Oct 31, 2010 4:53 pm
I saw this another forum.
Who do they think they are fooling saying they are targeting working musicians?
No working musician (who plans on getting more work) would show up to a gig with one of these.
I'm not really sure what they think they're doing here.
I'm legitimately pretty confused!
devnulljp wrote: So....can we legitimately ask is Henry Juszkiewicz secretly working for Fender?
I lol'd IRL.
hbombgraphics wrote: paypal gift awakens a beast from underneath the earth that eats puppies
fuzzmax
experienced
Posts: 917 Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 7:30 am
Location: Joliette, Quebec
Post
by fuzzmax » Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:35 pm
I think it's cool to evolve with time, age, fashion, etc... but I think Gibson misses the point with all the new designs.....
metalmariachi
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 3079 Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 6:46 am
Location: Maryland
Post
by metalmariachi » Mon Nov 01, 2010 7:31 pm
They have gone stranger in the past.
GibsonModerne1.jpg (12.14 KiB) Viewed 1074 times
One day I’ll build a bass version of this but with a Thunderbird head stock.
I think it would look very coll.
MM
金属マリアッチ
MARIATCHIMETARU
"First we have to make you pretty"
Mudfuzz
HERO
Posts: 16705 Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:06 pm
Location: The gloomy lands of the northwest
Post
by Mudfuzz » Mon Nov 01, 2010 7:38 pm
metalmariachi wrote: They have gone stranger in the past.
GibsonModerne1.jpg
One day I’ll build a bass version of this but with a Thunderbird head stock.
I think it would look very coll.
MM
That would be the shit.
There was a builder in the 90's that did a headless bass version that had normal tuners mounted in the body, name escapes me....
Toonster
FAMOUS
Posts: 1470 Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:25 pm
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:
Post
by Toonster » Mon Nov 01, 2010 7:42 pm
metalmariachi wrote: They have gone stranger in the past.
GibsonModerne1.jpg
One day I’ll build a bass version of this but with a Thunderbird head stock.
I think it would look very coll.
MM
But this kind of strange looks way better in my opinion!
Mudfuzz
HERO
Posts: 16705 Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:06 pm
Location: The gloomy lands of the northwest
Post
by Mudfuzz » Mon Nov 01, 2010 7:58 pm
Toonster wrote: metalmariachi wrote: They have gone stranger in the past.
GibsonModerne1.jpg
One day I’ll build a bass version of this but with a Thunderbird head stock.
I think it would look very coll.
MM
But this kind of strange looks way better in my opinion!
I agree, I like Modernes, I got to play a Ibanez lawsuit on once man what a guitar! Also the Moderne shape was draw by Ted McCarty
You can't get much more mojo than that
Gearmond
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 3040 Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 12:59 am
Location: Cleveland, OH
Contact:
Post
by Gearmond » Mon Nov 01, 2010 7:59 pm
yeah, and they DID have that one, whose name escapes me, that was basically a firebird as drawn by someone sloshed out of their mind.
Mudfuzz
HERO
Posts: 16705 Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:06 pm
Location: The gloomy lands of the northwest
Post
by Mudfuzz » Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:07 pm
What era you talkin' aboot? You mean a RD Artist, those are cool, they weigh a ton and had moogness inside of them.
Gearmond
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 3040 Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 12:59 am
Location: Cleveland, OH
Contact:
Post
by Gearmond » Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:11 pm
i think they're oogleh.
also not much of a fan of active electronics on guitars
Mudfuzz
HERO
Posts: 16705 Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:06 pm
Location: The gloomy lands of the northwest
Post
by Mudfuzz » Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:14 pm
On the guitars... yeah... actually I tend to forget there even was a guitar version... But the Bass version
I like active on bass, I like moog, I like kooky shapes so RD bass = win
Gearmond
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 3040 Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 12:59 am
Location: Cleveland, OH
Contact:
Post
by Gearmond » Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:21 pm
dunno what it is about bass, but we get away with the kookiest shapes... BC Rich excluded >_> and yeah. active electronics and bass are wonderful, particularly Lakland and G&L's circuits. there is NOTHING you can't do on those.
theavondon
Supporter
Posts: 10742 Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:58 am
Location: Denton, TX
Post
by theavondon » Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:21 pm
Mudfuzz wrote: What era you talkin' aboot? You mean a RD Artist, those are cool, they weigh a ton and had moogness inside of them.
The RD Artist is my white whale of basses. I will perpetually want one.
Mudfuzz
HERO
Posts: 16705 Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:06 pm
Location: The gloomy lands of the northwest
Post
by Mudfuzz » Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:24 pm
Gearmond wrote: dunno what it is about bass, but we get away with the kookiest shapes... BC Rich excluded >_> and yeah. active electronics and bass are wonderful, particularly Lakland and G&L's circuits. there is NOTHING you can't do on those.
Yeah I agree, both are really cool!
theavondon wrote: Mudfuzz wrote: What era you talkin' aboot? You mean a RD Artist, those are cool, they weigh a ton and had moogness inside of them.
The RD Artist is my white whale of basses. I will perpetually want one.
ESP makes a white one....
but I don't think it has the same type of electronics..
theavondon
Supporter
Posts: 10742 Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2010 2:58 am
Location: Denton, TX
Post
by theavondon » Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:08 am
Mudfuzz wrote: theavondon wrote: Mudfuzz wrote: What era you talkin' aboot? You mean a RD Artist, those are cool, they weigh a ton and had moogness inside of them.
The RD Artist is my white whale of basses. I will perpetually want one.
ESP makes a white one....
but I don't think it has the same type of electronics..
I know. My dad had one in the seventies. It weighed fifteen pounds.
Mudfuzz
HERO
Posts: 16705 Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 7:06 pm
Location: The gloomy lands of the northwest
Post
by Mudfuzz » Tue Nov 02, 2010 12:18 am