Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the modulator masses

General Gear Discussion - effects, synths, etc.

Moderator: Ghost Hip

Post Reply
User avatar
Dandolin
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 11125
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:33 pm
Location: On the pharm in PA

Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses

Post by Dandolin »

OK - waiting for Her to fall asleep :lol:
"In a moment of unparalleled genius, Noel Parachute headed off this potential disaster by unplugging the microphone."
User avatar
Chankgeez
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 42156
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc

Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses

Post by Chankgeez »

psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
User avatar
Dandolin
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 11125
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:33 pm
Location: On the pharm in PA

Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses

Post by Dandolin »

killer app for me - the ability to set s&h rate to zero then tap that left f/sw for a different rang pitch each tap :)*

wishlist for future versioning: external tap input :snax:
"In a moment of unparalleled genius, Noel Parachute headed off this potential disaster by unplugging the microphone."
User avatar
Dowi
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2658
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2016 8:12 am
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses

Post by Dowi »

Dandolin wrote:killer app for me - the ability to set s&h rate to zero then tap that left f/sw for a different rang pitch each tap :)*

wishlist for future versioning: external tap input :snax:
What would you need it for? Mod rate? Except if using it as tremolo I don't know what could I use it for.

Anyways, killer. :excellent:
BIRCH BARK | Solo stuff | Bandcamp - Youtube
HIBAGON | Polyrhythmic Heavy Duo | Bandcamp - Spotyshit
User avatar
Dandolin
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 11125
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:33 pm
Location: On the pharm in PA

Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses

Post by Dandolin »

external tap? sending gate signals in an effort to get the 0-rate s&h to do rhythmic and/or fuqq'd up things without wearing out the switch/my ankle? :idk:
"In a moment of unparalleled genius, Noel Parachute headed off this potential disaster by unplugging the microphone."
User avatar
crochambeau
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2205
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 12:49 pm
Location: Cascadia
Contact:

Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses

Post by crochambeau »

Dowi wrote:
Dandolin wrote:wishlist for future versioning: external tap input :snax:
What would you need it for?
External control input ports can be highly useful, I would suggest making it map-able to any switch function so you can do stuff like initiate bypass cycling via external pulse (like a variable length one shot pulse triggered from a drum machine, or the ubiquitous 555 oscillator that might be gathering dust in the corner), or playable functions as dandolin described. It's often groovy to free up hands and feet for other things.

Nice to see Pladask dive into the ring mod pit, that things sounds great!
User avatar
Dandolin
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 11125
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:33 pm
Location: On the pharm in PA

Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses

Post by Dandolin »

:zen: def appreciate those ideas, Curtis - could something like what you're describing be implemented in a Monobius? :snax: Seems like the "map to any function" thing is really in the province of dsp simply because doing it without a microprocessor could lead to things getting too complicated and big to be worth it with old school wires and switches? :idk:
Last edited by Dandolin on Thu Nov 19, 2020 4:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"In a moment of unparalleled genius, Noel Parachute headed off this potential disaster by unplugging the microphone."
User avatar
crochambeau
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2205
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 12:49 pm
Location: Cascadia
Contact:

Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses

Post by crochambeau »

Dandolin wrote::zen: def appreciate those ideas, Curtis - could something like what you're describing be implemented in a Monobius? :snax: Seems like the "map to any function" thing is really in the province of dsp simply because doing it without a microrpocessor could lead to things getting too complicated and big to be worth it with old school wires and switches? :idk:
Yeah, the Monobius is pretty firmly planted in the dumb analog realm, so introducing this sort of feature could be complex.

That said, I have been implementing CMOS switching with a lot of designs and do have some utility boards built that can decouple the signal path aspect from the panel mount toggle/switch. The physical switch is then relegated to providing logic states to actuate to solid state switching tucked elsewhere. The re-mapping I spoke of simply replaces the static on/off logic signal from the physical switch with another source - so strictly speaking we can walk right up to this feature without relying on a microprocessor (but I would guess no one needs an explanation as to why adding a micro would make this sort of thing VASTLY more powerful and "easy" to implement).

So TL;DR yes, I can add remote switching to *some* of the functions (ringmod/fuzz mode comes to mind), though others will be affected by the imposed resistance/lack of reactance by the metal oxide active stages of the switch, and therefore would require testing and experimentation to confirm the potential. I don't consider that a high priority for the Monobius, because I'm still working on the Polybius and that topology will be much more tolerant of external controls.

Ugh, I'm spiraling out again, so TL;DR some aspects of the Monobius can be affected remotely, but in doing so there will need to be "dumb" ports that add to clutter and/or an additional function switch that "maps" to whichever path wants to be wiggled. Might also be noisy switching with such a brute force method (making audio rate switching problematic - that's better served with the aforementioned microprocessor)
User avatar
Dandolin
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 11125
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 2:33 pm
Location: On the pharm in PA

Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses

Post by Dandolin »

crochambeau wrote:
Dandolin wrote::zen: def appreciate those ideas, Curtis - could something like what you're describing be implemented in a Monobius? :snax: Seems like the "map to any function" thing is really in the province of dsp simply because doing it without a microrpocessor could lead to things getting too complicated and big to be worth it with old school wires and switches? :idk:
Yeah, the Monobius is pretty firmly planted in the dumb analog realm, so introducing this sort of feature could be complex.

That said, I have been implementing CMOS switching with a lot of designs and do have some utility boards built that can decouple the signal path aspect from the panel mount toggle/switch. The physical switch is then relegated to providing logic states to actuate to solid state switching tucked elsewhere. The re-mapping I spoke of simply replaces the static on/off logic signal from the physical switch with another source - so strictly speaking we can walk right up to this feature without relying on a microprocessor (but I would guess no one needs an explanation as to why adding a micro would make this sort of thing VASTLY more powerful and "easy" to implement).

So TL;DR yes, I can add remote switching to *some* of the functions (ringmod/fuzz mode comes to mind), though others will be affected by the imposed resistance/lack of reactance by the metal oxide active stages of the switch, and therefore would require testing and experimentation to confirm the potential. I don't consider that a high priority for the Monobius, because I'm still working on the Polybius and that topology will be much more tolerant of external controls.

Ugh, I'm spiraling out again, so TL;DR some aspects of the Monobius can be affected remotely, but in doing so there will need to be "dumb" ports that add to clutter and/or an additional function switch that "maps" to whichever path wants to be wiggled. Might also be noisy switching with such a brute force method (making audio rate switching problematic - that's better served with the aforementioned microprocessor)
i suspected as much, but thanks for taking the time to run that rabbit down :hug:
i guess i'll never stop dreaming of ways to mate the shear sonic force that the analog approach affords, especially with ring modulation, to the tricksier use cases that are more easily attainable with dsp.... not that Feber doesn't sound great - it just doesn't swing as big a pair as Monobius...and it's not as if Monobius doesn't have some pretty great tricks up it's sleeve. Definitely room for both in the balanced mod pedal fold :group:
"In a moment of unparalleled genius, Noel Parachute headed off this potential disaster by unplugging the microphone."
User avatar
crochambeau
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2205
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 12:49 pm
Location: Cascadia
Contact:

Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses

Post by crochambeau »

Dandolin wrote:Definitely room for both in the balanced mod pedal fold :group:
Agreed!
User avatar
Dowi
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2658
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2016 8:12 am
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses

Post by Dowi »

Dandolin wrote:external tap? sending gate signals in an effort to get the 0-rate s&h to do rhythmic and/or fuqq'd up things without wearing out the switch/my ankle? :idk:
crochambeau wrote:
Dowi wrote:
Dandolin wrote:wishlist for future versioning: external tap input :snax:
What would you need it for?
External control input ports can be highly useful, I would suggest making it map-able to any switch function so you can do stuff like initiate bypass cycling via external pulse (like a variable length one shot pulse triggered from a drum machine, or the ubiquitous 555 oscillator that might be gathering dust in the corner), or playable functions as dandolin described. It's often groovy to free up hands and feet for other things.

Nice to see Pladask dive into the ring mod pit, that things sounds great!
Dumb me, I just thought of it as a tap tempo switch. :facepalm: never messed with cv but I see your point
BIRCH BARK | Solo stuff | Bandcamp - Youtube
HIBAGON | Polyrhythmic Heavy Duo | Bandcamp - Spotyshit
User avatar
Chankgeez
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 42156
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc

Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses

Post by Chankgeez »

Demos still soundin' very nice to me:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfdw39CPMdw[/youtube]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfdw39CPMdw

:love:
psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
User avatar
crochambeau
IAMILF
IAMILF
Posts: 2205
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2015 12:49 pm
Location: Cascadia
Contact:

Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses

Post by crochambeau »

So, of late I have been experimenting with modulation schemes. In one corner there is a discrete transistor four quadrant multiplier (Gilbert Cell), and in another I had a go at employing "super diodes" (which are opamp compensated diodes to eliminate the forward voltage drop) in an otherwise conventional transformer coupled diode ring.

In both instances I have observed an almost "half modulated" performance, in which I can more or less suppress the carrier signal while the primary input is silent, but the primary input is not suppressed at the lack of the carrier. It's sonically pleasing, but shies away from deep modulation.
User avatar
Chankgeez
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 42156
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc

Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses

Post by Chankgeez »

:thumb:

Wonderin' what it'd sound like with this entire track run through it:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqqBs6kkzHE[/youtube]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqqBs6kkzHE

:idk: :snax:
psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
User avatar
Chankgeez
IAMILFFAMOUS
IAMILFFAMOUS
Posts: 42156
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:40 am
Location: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGhbeHujNZQ youtube.com/watch?v=V-2l7kkBURc

Re: Ring (and/or Balanced) Modulation for the masses

Post by Chankgeez »

psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…
Sweet dealin's: here
"Now, of course, Strega is not a Minimoog… and I am not Sun Ra" - dude from MAKENOISE
#GreenRinger
Post Reply