BetterOffShred wrote:Well the 386 is very unique, though it's made in 3 voltage ranges, and all 3 sounded different in my build, and even among each range, different chips sounded different. 386 is used in a lot of things as a gain stage so it's worth having a bunch.
It's a good pedal but you may want to look at what dino did with a load emulator using a 018 transformer so it works right on single coils. It's been years since I built mine, and I have mostly humbucker guitars so I didn't do it to mine.
The pickup simulator on the front end is to give the circuit an impedance that it likes to see when using any sort of buffer in front of it. Without it, the buffer will kill the oscillation section of the circuit, which IMHO, is the best part. Otherwise, the circuit works just as well with single coils, as it does with buckers.
This is the pickup sim I used;
And my vero which incorporates the pickup sim;
Bigger version vero:
https://www.aronnelson.com/gallery/main ... ewsIndex=1
Insofar as the 386 is concerned, I had the best results with the N-1 version, which is the lowest power output of the different N models. Using the higher output N-3, or N-4 (I find) diminishes the oscillation capacity. I think the lower the output power from the 386, the better the oscillation and starve sounds are. Of course, YMMV, so socket away.
My unit is a three footswitch build, allowing me to bypass, oscillation, and starve with the footswitches. This works for me, since I can set it up, and then switch stuff on/off on the fly.
All I can say, is that this is one of the most underrated circuits ever. Lots of people turn their noses up on it, but it was one of the first pedals I ever built, dating back close to 10 years now. This, along with my Uglyface, has occupied a permanent place on my pedalboard ever since then, and it doesn't look like anything is about to come along to knock it off anytime soon (read "ever").