Well, you know I have a fondness for greenbursts:
https://reverb.com/item/54514498-guitare-egmond-vintage
Moderator: Ghost Hip
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
Dandolin wrote: textured asphalt shingle and the paint
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
Chankgeez wrote::love:Dandolin wrote: textured asphalt shingle and the paint
band name?
…oh, and, also:
https://reverb.com/item/54579975-fender ... arkle-rare
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
Dandolin wrote:yeah, ugly guitar conservatism plays a big role in that
to me tho they do tend to sound a bit middy, at least the ones i've played, and i was never a huge fan of that back shape - tends to creep forward on me. don't really care what the back is made of tbh - while there are guitars where back construction effects the tone a fair bit, i don't feel like that is one of them. i think picked them more for reliability/stability/uniformity than for outstanding tone tho
another prejudice i think comes from them being a popular choice among early piezo users and thos early pieazos were a quacking mess (still don't like piezos myself, tho they can sound better than most of the early guitar-installed ones did without too much investment of time or resources)
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 29 guests