Moderator: Ghost Hip
Chankgeez wrote:
MightyMiloQuinn wrote:!!!!!!!!!!
MrNovember wrote:!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
univalve wrote:Boner on Fire Wallet Panties!
fairfield wrote:Pop wrote:I freely admit that I'm trying to emulate the sounds of the 60s, and so tap tempo doesn't fit into my desires.
This pretty much sums it up for me as well. I like it when it's queazy, unpredictable and a little shitty sounding. Tap tempo has its uses, but also its pitfalls. Akin to recording drums with a click track.
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
sonidero wrote:Roll a plus 13 for fire and with my immunity to wack I dodge the cough and pass a turn to chill and look at these rocks...
kbithecrowing wrote:Making out with my girl friday night, I couldn't stop thinking about flangers.
Chankgeez wrote:From the Fairfield Circuitry blog:
" Shipping is scheduled to start mid-May.
Some details have changed since our last post. Notably the delay time is now spec'd as 500ms to 50ms. We really wanted to reach a shorter time than 100ms and the noise goes up considerably with long delay times, especially when you're pushing the BBDs beyond their specs. We'll try to lower the minimum delay time during manufacturing but it remains a good estimate of its range."
…...........................…psychic vampire. wrote:The important take away from this thread: Taoism and Ring Modulators go together?
sylnau wrote:The Retro-Sonic Analog Delay goes to 800ms.
I guess a switch to go from short to long delay like the Retro-Sonic or the Moog Analog Delay would have been a good idea (but probably too late now).
Users browsing this forum: Zork and 19 guests